Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Roman Polak Nate Schmidt

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRoman Polak: Goals, 0.01 a game, 12th percentileRoman Polak: Assists, 0.19 a game, 50th percentileRoman Polak: Points, 0.20 a game, 38th percentileRoman Polak: Shots, 1.15 a game, 45th percentileRoman Polak: Hits, 3.84 a game, 99th percentileRoman Polak: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 47th percentileRoman Polak: CF% rel, -3.1, 20th percentileRoman Polak: On-ice xG %, 53.4%, 82nd percentileRoman Polak: Rating, +7.4 goals above replacement, 84th percentileRoman Polak: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 46th percentileRoman Polak: Shot quality, 3.3% a shot, 56th percentileRoman Polak: Finishing, -3.6 goals above expected, 3rd percentileNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.03 a game, 27th percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.19 a game, 52nd percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.22 a game, 44th percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.11 a game, 41st percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 0.96 a game, 38th percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 50.7%, 61st percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, 0.3, 58th percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 50.9%, 62nd percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +8.3 goals above replacement, 88th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 55th percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 3.5% a shot, 67th percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, -2.4 goals above expected, 9th percentile
051015204060Roman Polak 16Nate Schmidt 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Roman Polak
Nate Schmidt

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Roman Polak D, DAL 2015-16 Nate Schmidt D, UTA
79 Games played 72
1 Goals 2
15 Assists 14
16 Points 16
0.20 Points per game 0.22
6 Plus/minus 12
91 Shots 80
1.1 Shooting % 2.5
303 Hits 69
72 Penalty minutes 16
19:09 Average ice time 18:04
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.8 Corsi for % 50.7
-3.1 CF% relative to team +0.3
49.0 Fenwick for % 51.0
53.4 Expected goals for % 50.9
-0.5 xGF% relative to team -0.2
50.7 Goals for % 55.8
100.5 PDO 101.1
209 Shot attempts taken 170
Expected goals, all situations
4.6 Expected goals 4.4
0.18 Expected goals per 60 0.20
3.3% Chance per attempt 3.5%
-3.6 Goals above expected -2.4
Rating, in goals
+7.4 Goals above replacement +8.3
+1.2 Wins above replacement +1.4
-2.0 Even-strength offence -0.7
+4.0 Even-strength defence +2.6
-0.1 Power play -0.1
+1.1 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.7 Penalties +2.0
Contract
$2.75M Cap hit $813K
$172K Cap dollars per point $51K
$5.3M Worth at the going rate $5.8M
+$2.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean