Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Daniel Winnik Colin Greening

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDaniel Winnik: Goals, 0.13 a game, 37th percentileDaniel Winnik: Assists, 0.27 a game, 60th percentileDaniel Winnik: Points, 0.40 a game, 52nd percentileDaniel Winnik: Shots, 1.98 a game, 67th percentileDaniel Winnik: Hits, 1.31 a game, 58th percentileDaniel Winnik: Corsi for %, 49.7%, 49th percentileDaniel Winnik: CF% rel, 2.5, 74th percentileDaniel Winnik: On-ice xG %, 49.6%, 49th percentileDaniel Winnik: Rating, +3.4 goals above replacement, 70th percentileDaniel Winnik: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 23rd percentileDaniel Winnik: Shot quality, 6.1% a shot, 13th percentileDaniel Winnik: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 33rd percentileColin Greening: Goals, 0.17 a game, 53rd percentileColin Greening: Assists, 0.23 a game, 54th percentileColin Greening: Points, 0.40 a game, 53rd percentileColin Greening: Shots, 1.70 a game, 53rd percentileColin Greening: Hits, 2.60 a game, 94th percentileColin Greening: Corsi for %, 53.4%, 78th percentileColin Greening: CF% rel, -0.3, 48th percentileColin Greening: On-ice xG %, 52.2%, 69th percentileColin Greening: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 51st percentileColin Greening: Chances created, 0.79 xG per 60, 67th percentileColin Greening: Shot quality, 7.8% a shot, 62nd percentileColin Greening: Finishing, -2.2 goals above expected, 21st percentile
0510152040Daniel Winnik 19Colin Greening 19

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Daniel Winnik
Colin Greening

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Daniel Winnik L, MIN 2012-13 Colin Greening C, TOR
48 Games played 47
6 Goals 8
13 Assists 11
19 Points 19
0.40 Points per game 0.40
13 Plus/minus 5
95 Shots 80
6.3 Shooting % 10.0
63 Hits 122
16 Penalty minutes 11
16:50 Average ice time 14:44
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.7 Corsi for % 53.4
+2.5 CF% relative to team -0.3
50.4 Fenwick for % 53.1
49.6 Expected goals for % 52.2
+0.3 xGF% relative to team -1.1
59.0 Goals for % 52.6
101.5 PDO 100.3
133 Shot attempts taken 123
Expected goals, all situations
7.4 Expected goals 9.2
0.55 Expected goals per 60 0.79
6.1% Chance per attempt 7.8%
-1.4 Goals above expected -2.2
Rating, in goals
+3.4 Goals above replacement +2.0
+0.6 Wins above replacement +0.3
-0.5 Even-strength offence +0.6
+1.5 Even-strength defence -1.7
-0.1 Power play +0.5
+0.1 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.1 Penalties +0.8
Contract
$1.8M Cap hit $817K
$95K Cap dollars per point $43K
$3.5M Worth at the going rate $2.3M
+$1.7M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean