Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Adam Cracknell Tyler Johnson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAdam Cracknell: Goals, 0.10 a game, 31st percentileAdam Cracknell: Assists, 0.20 a game, 47th percentileAdam Cracknell: Points, 0.30 a game, 39th percentileAdam Cracknell: Shots, 1.05 a game, 19th percentileAdam Cracknell: Hits, 1.10 a game, 47th percentileAdam Cracknell: Corsi for %, 55.3%, 87th percentileAdam Cracknell: CF% rel, 5.8, 92nd percentileAdam Cracknell: On-ice xG %, 55.9%, 85th percentileAdam Cracknell: Rating, +1.6 goals above replacement, 45th percentileAdam Cracknell: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 33rd percentileAdam Cracknell: Shot quality, 6.0% a shot, 13th percentileAdam Cracknell: Finishing, +0.3 goals above expected, 56th percentileTyler Johnson: Goals, 0.21 a game, 65th percentileTyler Johnson: Assists, 0.21 a game, 51st percentileTyler Johnson: Points, 0.43 a game, 55th percentileTyler Johnson: Shots, 0.79 a game, 10th percentileTyler Johnson: Hits, 1.29 a game, 57th percentileTyler Johnson: Corsi for %, 50.8%, 60th percentileTyler Johnson: CF% rel, 4.5, 84th percentileTyler Johnson: On-ice xG %, 47.2%, 31st percentileTyler Johnson: Rating, +0.4 goals above replacement, 28th percentileTyler Johnson: Chances created, 0.40 xG per 60, 6th percentileTyler Johnson: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 19th percentileTyler Johnson: Finishing, +1.8 goals above expected, 74th percentile
024620Adam Cracknell 6Tyler Johnson 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Adam Cracknell
Tyler Johnson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Adam Cracknell R, ANA 2012-13 Tyler Johnson C, BOS
20 Games played 14
2 Goals 3
4 Assists 3
6 Points 6
0.30 Points per game 0.43
3 Plus/minus 3
21 Shots 11
9.5 Shooting % 27.3
22 Hits 18
4 Penalty minutes 4
8:37 Average ice time 13:04
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
55.3 Corsi for % 50.8
+5.8 CF% relative to team +4.5
56.5 Fenwick for % 48.4
55.9 Expected goals for % 47.2
+5.0 xGF% relative to team -3.5
66.7 Goals for % 70.0
102.2 PDO 106.4
39 Shot attempts taken 20
Expected goals, all situations
1.7 Expected goals 1.2
0.60 Expected goals per 60 0.40
6.0% Chance per attempt 6.4%
+0.3 Goals above expected +1.8
Rating, in goals
+1.6 Goals above replacement +0.4
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.1
+0.4 Even-strength offence +0.0
+0.7 Even-strength defence +0.2
0.0 Power play -0.4
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.2
+0.0 Penalties +0.2

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean