Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Adam Cracknell Austin Watson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAdam Cracknell: Goals, 0.10 a game, 26th percentileAdam Cracknell: Assists, 0.10 a game, 18th percentileAdam Cracknell: Points, 0.19 a game, 21st percentileAdam Cracknell: Shots, 1.31 a game, 34th percentileAdam Cracknell: Hits, 2.38 a game, 90th percentileAdam Cracknell: Corsi for %, 46.9%, 22nd percentileAdam Cracknell: CF% rel, -0.3, 43rd percentileAdam Cracknell: On-ice xG %, 44.7%, 13th percentileAdam Cracknell: Rating, +2.1 goals above replacement, 44th percentileAdam Cracknell: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 22nd percentileAdam Cracknell: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 18th percentileAdam Cracknell: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 44th percentileAustin Watson: Goals, 0.05 a game, 11th percentileAustin Watson: Assists, 0.12 a game, 26th percentileAustin Watson: Points, 0.18 a game, 17th percentileAustin Watson: Shots, 0.96 a game, 15th percentileAustin Watson: Hits, 1.30 a game, 57th percentileAustin Watson: Corsi for %, 45.3%, 10th percentileAustin Watson: CF% rel, -8.9, 1st percentileAustin Watson: On-ice xG %, 46.2%, 22nd percentileAustin Watson: Rating, +0.5 goals above replacement, 28th percentileAustin Watson: Chances created, 0.41 xG per 60, 4th percentileAustin Watson: Shot quality, 5.6% a shot, 4th percentileAustin Watson: Finishing, -1.9 goals above expected, 33rd percentile
02468102040Adam Cracknell 10Austin Watson 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Adam Cracknell
Austin Watson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Adam Cracknell R, ANA 2015-16 Austin Watson L, DET
52 Games played 57
5 Goals 3
5 Assists 7
10 Points 10
0.19 Points per game 0.18
-1 Plus/minus -4
68 Shots 55
7.4 Shooting % 5.5
124 Hits 74
20 Penalty minutes 32
12:14 Average ice time 10:00
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.9 Corsi for % 45.3
-0.3 CF% relative to team -8.9
46.9 Fenwick for % 47.8
44.7 Expected goals for % 46.2
-1.1 xGF% relative to team -9.1
44.0 Goals for % 38.2
99.5 PDO 96.4
116 Shot attempts taken 88
Expected goals, all situations
5.9 Expected goals 3.9
0.55 Expected goals per 60 0.41
6.4% Chance per attempt 5.6%
-0.9 Goals above expected -1.9
Rating, in goals
+2.1 Goals above replacement +0.5
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.1
-1.5 Even-strength offence -3.2
+1.5 Even-strength defence +2.6
-0.1 Power play 0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.4
+0.6 Penalties -0.8
Contract
$575K Cap hit $575K
$58K Cap dollars per point $58K
$1.9M Worth at the going rate $898K
+$1.3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$323K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean