Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Gilbert Brule Richard Park

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerGilbert Brule: Goals, 0.15 a game, 47th percentileGilbert Brule: Assists, 0.27 a game, 62nd percentileGilbert Brule: Points, 0.42 a game, 55th percentileGilbert Brule: Shots, 1.70 a game, 53rd percentileGilbert Brule: Hits, 1.67 a game, 78th percentileGilbert Brule: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 42nd percentileGilbert Brule: CF% rel, 0.8, 56th percentileGilbert Brule: On-ice xG %, 49.6%, 48th percentileGilbert Brule: Rating, +2.9 goals above replacement, 53rd percentileGilbert Brule: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 53rd percentileGilbert Brule: Shot quality, 6.0% a shot, 13th percentileGilbert Brule: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 56th percentileRichard Park: Goals, 0.13 a game, 41st percentileRichard Park: Assists, 0.13 a game, 29th percentileRichard Park: Points, 0.26 a game, 33rd percentileRichard Park: Shots, 0.81 a game, 10th percentileRichard Park: Hits, 0.52 a game, 15th percentileRichard Park: Corsi for %, 51.1%, 60th percentileRichard Park: CF% rel, -3.6, 19th percentileRichard Park: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 38th percentileRichard Park: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 21st percentileRichard Park: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 11th percentileRichard Park: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 54th percentileRichard Park: Finishing, +2.3 goals above expected, 70th percentile
05102040Gilbert Brule 14Richard Park 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Gilbert Brule
Richard Park

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Gilbert Brule C, PHX 2011-12 Richard Park R, PIT
33 Games played 54
5 Goals 7
9 Assists 7
14 Points 14
0.42 Points per game 0.26
7 Plus/minus -1
56 Shots 44
8.9 Shooting % 15.9
55 Hits 28
11 Penalty minutes 12
11:34 Average ice time 10:55
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.3 Corsi for % 51.1
+0.8 CF% relative to team -3.6
49.7 Fenwick for % 51.8
49.6 Expected goals for % 48.5
+0.4 xGF% relative to team -5.4
60.6 Goals for % 48.6
105.1 PDO 99.2
78 Shot attempts taken 76
Expected goals, all situations
4.6 Expected goals 4.7
0.72 Expected goals per 60 0.48
6.0% Chance per attempt 7.6%
+0.4 Goals above expected +2.3
Rating, in goals
+2.9 Goals above replacement -0.2
+0.5 Wins above replacement 0.0
+0.6 Even-strength offence -2.3
+0.8 Even-strength defence -0.4
-0.3 Power play +0.3
0.0 Penalty kill +0.2
+0.7 Penalties +0.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean