Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

James Neal David Krejci

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJames Neal: Goals, 0.35 a game, 88th percentileJames Neal: Assists, 0.27 a game, 57th percentileJames Neal: Points, 0.62 a game, 75th percentileJames Neal: Shots, 2.85 a game, 90th percentileJames Neal: Hits, 0.62 a game, 27th percentileJames Neal: Corsi for %, 50.3%, 54th percentileJames Neal: CF% rel, -0.7, 40th percentileJames Neal: On-ice xG %, 46.7%, 22nd percentileJames Neal: Rating, +4.5 goals above replacement, 66th percentileJames Neal: Chances created, 0.91 xG per 60, 76th percentileJames Neal: Shot quality, 6.8% a shot, 26th percentileJames Neal: Finishing, +5.6 goals above expected, 89th percentileDavid Krejci: Goals, 0.27 a game, 74th percentileDavid Krejci: Assists, 0.42 a game, 83rd percentileDavid Krejci: Points, 0.69 a game, 80th percentileDavid Krejci: Shots, 1.86 a game, 59th percentileDavid Krejci: Hits, 0.48 a game, 17th percentileDavid Krejci: Corsi for %, 54.3%, 91st percentileDavid Krejci: CF% rel, 0.8, 59th percentileDavid Krejci: On-ice xG %, 54.7%, 89th percentileDavid Krejci: Rating, +6.5 goals above replacement, 76th percentileDavid Krejci: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 40th percentileDavid Krejci: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 56th percentileDavid Krejci: Finishing, +4.7 goals above expected, 85th percentile
010203040204060James Neal 44David Krejci 44

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

James Neal
David Krejci

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

James Neal L, STL 2017-18 David Krejci C, BOS
71 Games played 64
25 Goals 17
19 Assists 27
44 Points 44
0.62 Points per game 0.69
-11 Plus/minus 10
202 Shots 119
12.4 Shooting % 14.3
44 Hits 31
24 Penalty minutes 18
17:11 Average ice time 16:53
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.3 Corsi for % 54.3
-0.7 CF% relative to team +0.8
49.9 Fenwick for % 54.4
46.7 Expected goals for % 54.7
-5.7 xGF% relative to team +1.2
45.9 Goals for % 56.1
98.6 PDO 100.9
281 Shot attempts taken 140
Expected goals, all situations
18.4 Expected goals 12.3
0.91 Expected goals per 60 0.68
6.8% Chance per attempt 7.7%
+5.6 Goals above expected +4.7
Rating, in goals
+4.5 Goals above replacement +6.5
+0.8 Wins above replacement +1.1
-0.6 Even-strength offence +2.7
-0.5 Even-strength defence -0.4
-0.9 Power play +0.3
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+3.2 Penalties +0.8
Contract
$5M Cap hit $7.25M
$114K Cap dollars per point $165K
$3.5M Worth at the going rate $4.8M
-$1.5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean