Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

James Neal Chris Wagner

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJames Neal: Goals, 0.11 a game, 27th percentileJames Neal: Assists, 0.19 a game, 39th percentileJames Neal: Points, 0.30 a game, 30th percentileJames Neal: Shots, 2.24 a game, 74th percentileJames Neal: Hits, 0.73 a game, 33rd percentileJames Neal: Corsi for %, 50.3%, 54th percentileJames Neal: CF% rel, -3.5, 13th percentileJames Neal: On-ice xG %, 49.0%, 41st percentileJames Neal: Rating, -2.1 goals above replacement, 6th percentileJames Neal: Chances created, 0.90 xG per 60, 69th percentileJames Neal: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 32nd percentileJames Neal: Finishing, -7.1 goals above expected, 2nd percentileChris Wagner: Goals, 0.16 a game, 45th percentileChris Wagner: Assists, 0.09 a game, 8th percentileChris Wagner: Points, 0.25 a game, 21st percentileChris Wagner: Shots, 1.78 a game, 56th percentileChris Wagner: Hits, 3.25 a game, 98th percentileChris Wagner: Corsi for %, 49.9%, 49th percentileChris Wagner: CF% rel, -4.2, 9th percentileChris Wagner: On-ice xG %, 50.7%, 53rd percentileChris Wagner: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 37th percentileChris Wagner: Chances created, 0.83 xG per 60, 58th percentileChris Wagner: Shot quality, 8.0% a shot, 52nd percentileChris Wagner: Finishing, -3.1 goals above expected, 25th percentile
051015204060James Neal 19Chris Wagner 19

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

James Neal
Chris Wagner

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

James Neal L, STL 2018-19 Chris Wagner R, COL
63 Games played 76
7 Goals 12
12 Assists 7
19 Points 19
0.30 Points per game 0.25
-5 Plus/minus 3
141 Shots 135
5.0 Shooting % 8.9
46 Hits 247
28 Penalty minutes 51
14:57 Average ice time 13:27
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.3 Corsi for % 49.9
-3.5 CF% relative to team -4.2
48.9 Fenwick for % 51.1
49.0 Expected goals for % 50.7
-4.7 xGF% relative to team -3.0
45.5 Goals for % 48.2
99.3 PDO 99.0
188 Shot attempts taken 203
Expected goals, all situations
14.1 Expected goals 14.1
0.90 Expected goals per 60 0.83
7.4% Chance per attempt 8.0%
-7.1 Goals above expected -3.1
Rating, in goals
-2.1 Goals above replacement +1.5
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.2
-2.6 Even-strength offence -2.0
-1.6 Even-strength defence +0.4
-0.7 Power play -0.1
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.6
+0.2 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$5.75M Cap hit $1.25M
$303K Cap dollars per point $66K
-$809K Worth at the going rate $1.6M
-$6.6M Value: worth minus cap hit +$378K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean