Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Taylor Chorney Luke Witkowski

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTaylor Chorney: Goals, 0.04 a game, 30th percentileTaylor Chorney: Assists, 0.12 a game, 19th percentileTaylor Chorney: Points, 0.16 a game, 20th percentileTaylor Chorney: Shots, 0.56 a game, 2nd percentileTaylor Chorney: Hits, 0.84 a game, 27th percentileTaylor Chorney: Corsi for %, 44.5%, 6th percentileTaylor Chorney: CF% rel, -4.9, 10th percentileTaylor Chorney: On-ice xG %, 45.9%, 14th percentileTaylor Chorney: Rating, -1.0 goals above replacement, 20th percentileTaylor Chorney: Chances created, 0.07 xG per 60, 2nd percentileTaylor Chorney: Shot quality, 1.9% a shot, 1st percentileTaylor Chorney: Finishing, +0.6 goals above expected, 57th percentileLuke Witkowski: Goals, 0.03 a game, 23rd percentileLuke Witkowski: Assists, 0.10 a game, 13th percentileLuke Witkowski: Points, 0.13 a game, 12th percentileLuke Witkowski: Shots, 0.52 a game, 1st percentileLuke Witkowski: Hits, 1.84 a game, 75th percentileLuke Witkowski: Corsi for %, 42.2%, 1st percentileLuke Witkowski: CF% rel, -7.5, 2nd percentileLuke Witkowski: On-ice xG %, 46.5%, 19th percentileLuke Witkowski: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 31st percentileLuke Witkowski: Chances created, 0.43 xG per 60, 99th percentileLuke Witkowski: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 99th percentileLuke Witkowski: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 39th percentile
0123420Taylor Chorney 4Luke Witkowski 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Taylor Chorney
Luke Witkowski

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Taylor Chorney D, CBJ 2017-18 Luke Witkowski D, DET
25 Games played 31
1 Goals 1
3 Assists 3
4 Points 4
0.16 Points per game 0.13
10 Plus/minus -1
14 Shots 16
7.1 Shooting % 6.3
21 Hits 57
8 Penalty minutes 68
13:08 Average ice time 6:53
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.5 Corsi for % 42.2
-4.9 CF% relative to team -7.5
44.4 Fenwick for % 43.8
45.9 Expected goals for % 46.5
-2.4 xGF% relative to team -3.0
69.6 Goals for % 46.2
107.6 PDO 100.4
33 Shot attempts taken 28
Expected goals, all situations
0.4 Expected goals 1.5
0.07 Expected goals per 60 0.43
1.9% Chance per attempt 6.6%
+0.6 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
-1.0 Goals above replacement +0.1
-0.2 Wins above replacement +0.0
-0.8 Even-strength offence +0.2
-0.1 Even-strength defence +0.2
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.8 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.5 Penalties -1.0
Contract
$800K Cap hit $750K
$200K Cap dollars per point $188K
-$32K Worth at the going rate $683K
-$832K Value: worth minus cap hit -$67K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean