Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Kris Russell Nate Prosser

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKris Russell: Goals, 0.11 a game, 84th percentileKris Russell: Assists, 0.11 a game, 17th percentileKris Russell: Points, 0.22 a game, 40th percentileKris Russell: Shots, 1.02 a game, 40th percentileKris Russell: Hits, 1.11 a game, 46th percentileKris Russell: Corsi for %, 51.9%, 73rd percentileKris Russell: CF% rel, -0.6, 46th percentileKris Russell: On-ice xG %, 56.4%, 96th percentileKris Russell: Rating, +4.6 goals above replacement, 75th percentileKris Russell: Chances created, 0.21 xG per 60, 60th percentileKris Russell: Shot quality, 4.2% a shot, 91st percentileKris Russell: Finishing, +2.7 goals above expected, 93rd percentileNate Prosser: Goals, 0.02 a game, 20th percentileNate Prosser: Assists, 0.22 a game, 53rd percentileNate Prosser: Points, 0.24 a game, 46th percentileNate Prosser: Shots, 0.63 a game, 11th percentileNate Prosser: Hits, 0.67 a game, 16th percentileNate Prosser: Corsi for %, 43.6%, 3rd percentileNate Prosser: CF% rel, -1.4, 37th percentileNate Prosser: On-ice xG %, 41.9%, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Rating, -2.2 goals above replacement, 9th percentileNate Prosser: Chances created, 0.13 xG per 60, 29th percentileNate Prosser: Shot quality, 4.4% a shot, 93rd percentileNate Prosser: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 30th percentile
05102040Kris Russell 12Nate Prosser 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kris Russell
Nate Prosser

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kris Russell D, EDM 2011-12 Nate Prosser D, PHI
55 Games played 51
6 Goals 1
6 Assists 11
12 Points 12
0.22 Points per game 0.24
12 Plus/minus -17
56 Shots 32
10.7 Shooting % 3.1
61 Hits 34
25 Penalty minutes 57
17:01 Average ice time 19:15
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.9 Corsi for % 43.6
-0.6 CF% relative to team -1.4
53.1 Fenwick for % 44.7
56.4 Expected goals for % 41.9
+2.8 xGF% relative to team -6.3
59.6 Goals for % 35.7
101.4 PDO 97.4
96 Shot attempts taken 59
Expected goals, all situations
3.3 Expected goals 2.1
0.21 Expected goals per 60 0.13
4.2% Chance per attempt 4.4%
+2.7 Goals above expected -1.1
Rating, in goals
+4.6 Goals above replacement -2.2
+0.8 Wins above replacement -0.4
+0.3 Even-strength offence -1.9
+2.1 Even-strength defence -1.9
-1.2 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.2 Penalties -1.5
Contract
$1.3M Cap hit $715K
$108K Cap dollars per point $60K
$2.6M Worth at the going rate -$479K
+$1.3M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean