Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Nathan Gerbe Michael Frolik

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNathan Gerbe: Goals, 0.12 a game, 36th percentileNathan Gerbe: Assists, 0.12 a game, 24th percentileNathan Gerbe: Points, 0.24 a game, 27th percentileNathan Gerbe: Shots, 1.52 a game, 46th percentileNathan Gerbe: Hits, 0.76 a game, 30th percentileNathan Gerbe: Corsi for %, 41.7%, 4th percentileNathan Gerbe: CF% rel, -4.2, 16th percentileNathan Gerbe: On-ice xG %, 39.4%, 2nd percentileNathan Gerbe: Rating, -1.3 goals above replacement, 9th percentileNathan Gerbe: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 21st percentileNathan Gerbe: Shot quality, 5.6% a shot, 6th percentileNathan Gerbe: Finishing, +0.3 goals above expected, 56th percentileMichael Frolik: Goals, 0.07 a game, 17th percentileMichael Frolik: Assists, 0.16 a game, 34th percentileMichael Frolik: Points, 0.22 a game, 24th percentileMichael Frolik: Shots, 2.18 a game, 74th percentileMichael Frolik: Hits, 0.71 a game, 27th percentileMichael Frolik: Corsi for %, 55.9%, 91st percentileMichael Frolik: CF% rel, 2.3, 73rd percentileMichael Frolik: On-ice xG %, 51.9%, 68th percentileMichael Frolik: Rating, +3.6 goals above replacement, 71st percentileMichael Frolik: Chances created, 0.64 xG per 60, 40th percentileMichael Frolik: Shot quality, 4.9% a shot, 1st percentileMichael Frolik: Finishing, -3.0 goals above expected, 13th percentile
02468102040Nathan Gerbe 10Michael Frolik 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nathan Gerbe
Michael Frolik

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nathan Gerbe C, CBJ 2012-13 Michael Frolik R, MTL
42 Games played 45
5 Goals 3
5 Assists 7
10 Points 10
0.24 Points per game 0.22
-3 Plus/minus 5
64 Shots 98
7.8 Shooting % 3.1
32 Hits 32
14 Penalty minutes 8
12:30 Average ice time 12:31
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
41.7 Corsi for % 55.9
-4.2 CF% relative to team +2.3
42.5 Fenwick for % 57.0
39.4 Expected goals for % 51.9
-5.3 xGF% relative to team -2.3
42.9 Goals for % 55.6
99.8 PDO 99.2
98 Shot attempts taken 134
Expected goals, all situations
4.7 Expected goals 6.0
0.54 Expected goals per 60 0.64
5.6% Chance per attempt 4.9%
+0.3 Goals above expected -3.0
Rating, in goals
-1.3 Goals above replacement +3.6
-0.2 Wins above replacement +0.6
-1.7 Even-strength offence -0.7
-0.8 Even-strength defence +2.1
-0.5 Power play -0.1
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.4
+0.1 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$1.45M Cap hit $2.333M
$145K Cap dollars per point $233K
-$601K Worth at the going rate $3.7M
-$2.1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean