Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Tim Kennedy Eric Tangradi

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTim Kennedy: Goals, 0.04 a game, 9th percentileTim Kennedy: Assists, 0.04 a game, 5th percentileTim Kennedy: Points, 0.07 a game, 4th percentileTim Kennedy: Shots, 0.81 a game, 10th percentileTim Kennedy: Hits, 1.78 a game, 81st percentileTim Kennedy: Corsi for %, 46.0%, 15th percentileTim Kennedy: CF% rel, -3.9, 17th percentileTim Kennedy: On-ice xG %, 45.5%, 16th percentileTim Kennedy: Rating, +0.7 goals above replacement, 30th percentileTim Kennedy: Chances created, 0.38 xG per 60, 2nd percentileTim Kennedy: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 54th percentileTim Kennedy: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 44th percentileEric Tangradi: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileEric Tangradi: Assists, 0.08 a game, 15th percentileEric Tangradi: Points, 0.08 a game, 5th percentileEric Tangradi: Shots, 0.83 a game, 12th percentileEric Tangradi: Hits, 1.75 a game, 80th percentileEric Tangradi: Corsi for %, 55.5%, 91st percentileEric Tangradi: CF% rel, -0.8, 42nd percentileEric Tangradi: On-ice xG %, 56.1%, 92nd percentileEric Tangradi: Rating, -0.3 goals above replacement, 20th percentileEric Tangradi: Chances created, 0.64 xG per 60, 36th percentileEric Tangradi: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 46th percentileEric Tangradi: Finishing, -2.3 goals above expected, 30th percentile
00.511.5220Tim Kennedy 2Eric Tangradi 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tim Kennedy
Eric Tangradi

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tim Kennedy L, PHX 2011-12 Eric Tangradi L, NJD
27 Games played 24
1 Goals 0
1 Assists 2
2 Points 2
0.07 Points per game 0.08
-11 Plus/minus -4
22 Shots 20
4.5 Shooting % 0.0
48 Hits 42
4 Penalty minutes 16
11:08 Average ice time 8:56
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.0 Corsi for % 55.5
-3.9 CF% relative to team -0.8
45.9 Fenwick for % 53.8
45.5 Expected goals for % 56.1
-1.8 xGF% relative to team -0.2
14.3 Goals for % 37.5
93.0 PDO 95.0
27 Shot attempts taken 38
Expected goals, all situations
1.9 Expected goals 2.3
0.38 Expected goals per 60 0.64
7.6% Chance per attempt 7.3%
-0.9 Goals above expected -2.3
Rating, in goals
+0.7 Goals above replacement -0.3
+0.1 Wins above replacement 0.0
-1.8 Even-strength offence -1.0
+1.0 Even-strength defence +0.7
-0.1 Power play -0.2
0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.9 Penalties -0.3

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean