Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Joe Vitale Richard Park

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJoe Vitale: Goals, 0.06 a game, 18th percentileJoe Vitale: Assists, 0.15 a game, 33rd percentileJoe Vitale: Points, 0.21 a game, 24th percentileJoe Vitale: Shots, 1.03 a game, 19th percentileJoe Vitale: Hits, 1.56 a game, 73rd percentileJoe Vitale: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 48th percentileJoe Vitale: CF% rel, -5.7, 7th percentileJoe Vitale: On-ice xG %, 51.9%, 66th percentileJoe Vitale: Rating, +3.8 goals above replacement, 60th percentileJoe Vitale: Chances created, 0.64 xG per 60, 36th percentileJoe Vitale: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 76th percentileJoe Vitale: Finishing, -4.1 goals above expected, 14th percentileRichard Park: Goals, 0.13 a game, 41st percentileRichard Park: Assists, 0.13 a game, 29th percentileRichard Park: Points, 0.26 a game, 33rd percentileRichard Park: Shots, 0.81 a game, 10th percentileRichard Park: Hits, 0.52 a game, 15th percentileRichard Park: Corsi for %, 51.1%, 60th percentileRichard Park: CF% rel, -3.6, 19th percentileRichard Park: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 38th percentileRichard Park: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 21st percentileRichard Park: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 11th percentileRichard Park: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 54th percentileRichard Park: Finishing, +2.3 goals above expected, 70th percentile
0510204060Joe Vitale 14Richard Park 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Joe Vitale
Richard Park

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Joe Vitale C, ARI 2011-12 Richard Park R, PIT
68 Games played 54
4 Goals 7
10 Assists 7
14 Points 14
0.21 Points per game 0.26
-5 Plus/minus -1
70 Shots 44
5.7 Shooting % 15.9
106 Hits 28
56 Penalty minutes 12
11:11 Average ice time 10:55
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.8 Corsi for % 51.1
-5.7 CF% relative to team -3.6
50.2 Fenwick for % 51.8
51.9 Expected goals for % 48.5
-2.1 xGF% relative to team -5.4
44.2 Goals for % 48.6
98.8 PDO 99.2
120 Shot attempts taken 76
Expected goals, all situations
8.1 Expected goals 4.7
0.64 Expected goals per 60 0.48
8.3% Chance per attempt 7.6%
-4.1 Goals above expected +2.3
Rating, in goals
+3.8 Goals above replacement -0.2
+0.6 Wins above replacement 0.0
-3.0 Even-strength offence -2.3
+3.3 Even-strength defence -0.4
0.0 Power play +0.3
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.2
+1.2 Penalties +0.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean