Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Colin Greening Shawn Horcoff

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerColin Greening: Goals, 0.23 a game, 69th percentileColin Greening: Assists, 0.26 a game, 57th percentileColin Greening: Points, 0.48 a game, 62nd percentileColin Greening: Shots, 1.87 a game, 61st percentileColin Greening: Hits, 2.90 a game, 96th percentileColin Greening: Corsi for %, 53.9%, 85th percentileColin Greening: CF% rel, 2.5, 74th percentileColin Greening: On-ice xG %, 48.1%, 35th percentileColin Greening: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 33rd percentileColin Greening: Chances created, 1.01 xG per 60, 91st percentileColin Greening: Shot quality, 8.8% a shot, 85th percentileColin Greening: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 40th percentileShawn Horcoff: Goals, 0.10 a game, 29th percentileShawn Horcoff: Assists, 0.15 a game, 34th percentileShawn Horcoff: Points, 0.25 a game, 31st percentileShawn Horcoff: Shots, 1.24 a game, 29th percentileShawn Horcoff: Hits, 0.98 a game, 42nd percentileShawn Horcoff: Corsi for %, 50.2%, 50th percentileShawn Horcoff: CF% rel, -2.7, 20th percentileShawn Horcoff: On-ice xG %, 53.4%, 75th percentileShawn Horcoff: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 18th percentileShawn Horcoff: Chances created, 0.57 xG per 60, 23rd percentileShawn Horcoff: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 47th percentileShawn Horcoff: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 39th percentile
0510152040Colin Greening 15Shawn Horcoff 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Colin Greening
Shawn Horcoff

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Colin Greening C, TOR 2015-16 Shawn Horcoff C, ANA
31 Games played 59
7 Goals 6
8 Assists 9
15 Points 15
0.48 Points per game 0.25
-2 Plus/minus 1
58 Shots 73
12.1 Shooting % 8.2
90 Hits 58
13 Penalty minutes 34
14:06 Average ice time 13:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.9 Corsi for % 50.2
+2.5 CF% relative to team -2.7
51.9 Fenwick for % 50.4
48.1 Expected goals for % 53.4
+0.0 xGF% relative to team +0.8
50.0 Goals for % 50.0
99.9 PDO 99.5
80 Shot attempts taken 105
Expected goals, all situations
7.4 Expected goals 7.4
1.01 Expected goals per 60 0.57
8.8% Chance per attempt 7.4%
-1.4 Goals above expected -1.4
Rating, in goals
+1.0 Goals above replacement -0.4
+0.2 Wins above replacement -0.1
+0.9 Even-strength offence -1.2
-0.9 Even-strength defence +1.0
-0.2 Power play -0.2
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.1 Penalties -2.2
Contract
$2.65M Cap hit $1.75M
$177K Cap dollars per point $117K
$1.2M Worth at the going rate $280K
-$1.4M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean