Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Colin Greening Emerson Etem

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerColin Greening: Goals, 0.23 a game, 69th percentileColin Greening: Assists, 0.26 a game, 57th percentileColin Greening: Points, 0.48 a game, 62nd percentileColin Greening: Shots, 1.87 a game, 61st percentileColin Greening: Hits, 2.90 a game, 96th percentileColin Greening: Corsi for %, 53.9%, 85th percentileColin Greening: CF% rel, 2.5, 74th percentileColin Greening: On-ice xG %, 48.1%, 35th percentileColin Greening: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 33rd percentileColin Greening: Chances created, 1.01 xG per 60, 91st percentileColin Greening: Shot quality, 8.8% a shot, 85th percentileColin Greening: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 40th percentileEmerson Etem: Goals, 0.12 a game, 36th percentileEmerson Etem: Assists, 0.14 a game, 31st percentileEmerson Etem: Points, 0.26 a game, 32nd percentileEmerson Etem: Shots, 1.72 a game, 56th percentileEmerson Etem: Hits, 1.50 a game, 67th percentileEmerson Etem: Corsi for %, 45.7%, 13th percentileEmerson Etem: CF% rel, -1.5, 29th percentileEmerson Etem: On-ice xG %, 44.2%, 11th percentileEmerson Etem: Rating, +3.1 goals above replacement, 53rd percentileEmerson Etem: Chances created, 0.76 xG per 60, 58th percentileEmerson Etem: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 38th percentileEmerson Etem: Finishing, -3.6 goals above expected, 19th percentile
0510152040Colin Greening 15Emerson Etem 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Colin Greening
Emerson Etem

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Colin Greening C, TOR 2015-16 Emerson Etem R, ANA
31 Games played 58
7 Goals 7
8 Assists 8
15 Points 15
0.48 Points per game 0.26
-2 Plus/minus -12
58 Shots 100
12.1 Shooting % 7.0
90 Hits 87
13 Penalty minutes 11
14:06 Average ice time 13:09
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.9 Corsi for % 45.7
+2.5 CF% relative to team -1.5
51.9 Fenwick for % 45.5
48.1 Expected goals for % 44.2
+0.0 xGF% relative to team +1.1
50.0 Goals for % 40.7
99.9 PDO 98.0
80 Shot attempts taken 172
Expected goals, all situations
7.4 Expected goals 9.6
1.01 Expected goals per 60 0.76
8.8% Chance per attempt 7.2%
-1.4 Goals above expected -3.6
Rating, in goals
+1.0 Goals above replacement +3.1
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.5
+0.9 Even-strength offence +1.1
-0.9 Even-strength defence -1.2
-0.2 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.1 Penalties +1.1
Contract
$2.65M Cap hit $850K
$177K Cap dollars per point $57K
$1.2M Worth at the going rate $2.5M
-$1.4M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.7M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean