Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Anton Stralman Matt Benning

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAnton Stralman: Goals, 0.04 a game, 36th percentileAnton Stralman: Assists, 0.32 a game, 77th percentileAnton Stralman: Points, 0.36 a game, 69th percentileAnton Stralman: Shots, 1.21 a game, 38th percentileAnton Stralman: Hits, 1.26 a game, 48th percentileAnton Stralman: Corsi for %, 48.1%, 32nd percentileAnton Stralman: CF% rel, -3.3, 18th percentileAnton Stralman: On-ice xG %, 48.6%, 42nd percentileAnton Stralman: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 33rd percentileAnton Stralman: Chances created, 0.14 xG per 60, 18th percentileAnton Stralman: Shot quality, 2.9% a shot, 42nd percentileAnton Stralman: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 51st percentileMatt Benning: Goals, 0.07 a game, 60th percentileMatt Benning: Assists, 0.17 a game, 36th percentileMatt Benning: Points, 0.24 a game, 43rd percentileMatt Benning: Shots, 1.34 a game, 50th percentileMatt Benning: Hits, 1.56 a game, 63rd percentileMatt Benning: Corsi for %, 48.2%, 33rd percentileMatt Benning: CF% rel, 0.4, 55th percentileMatt Benning: On-ice xG %, 48.8%, 43rd percentileMatt Benning: Rating, +1.9 goals above replacement, 52nd percentileMatt Benning: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 37th percentileMatt Benning: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 13th percentileMatt Benning: Finishing, +1.9 goals above expected, 84th percentile
051015204060Anton Stralman 17Matt Benning 17

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Anton Stralman
Matt Benning

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Anton Stralman D, BOS 2018-19 Matt Benning D, TOR
47 Games played 70
2 Goals 5
15 Assists 12
17 Points 17
0.36 Points per game 0.24
12 Plus/minus 11
57 Shots 94
3.5 Shooting % 5.3
59 Hits 109
8 Penalty minutes 33
20:31 Average ice time 14:57
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.1 Corsi for % 48.2
-3.3 CF% relative to team +0.4
46.5 Fenwick for % 47.2
48.6 Expected goals for % 48.8
-5.0 xGF% relative to team +2.1
54.9 Goals for % 55.8
102.7 PDO 102.5
116 Shot attempts taken 163
Expected goals, all situations
2.3 Expected goals 3.1
0.14 Expected goals per 60 0.18
2.9% Chance per attempt 2.4%
-0.3 Goals above expected +1.9
Rating, in goals
+0.3 Goals above replacement +1.9
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.3
-1.1 Even-strength offence -0.5
-2.0 Even-strength defence +0.3
0.0 Power play -0.7
+0.5 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.2 Penalties -0.9
Contract
$4.5M Cap hit $1.9M
$265K Cap dollars per point $112K
$826K Worth at the going rate $1.9M
-$3.7M Value: worth minus cap hit +$48K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean