Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Dan Girardi Michael Stone

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDan Girardi: Goals, 0.06 a game, 61st percentileDan Girardi: Assists, 0.17 a game, 42nd percentileDan Girardi: Points, 0.24 a game, 48th percentileDan Girardi: Shots, 0.89 a game, 16th percentileDan Girardi: Hits, 1.70 a game, 72nd percentileDan Girardi: Corsi for %, 44.2%, 2nd percentileDan Girardi: CF% rel, -5.3, 6th percentileDan Girardi: On-ice xG %, 46.1%, 17th percentileDan Girardi: Rating, -0.6 goals above replacement, 25th percentileDan Girardi: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 4th percentileDan Girardi: Shot quality, 2.2% a shot, 8th percentileDan Girardi: Finishing, +2.2 goals above expected, 85th percentileMichael Stone: Goals, 0.05 a game, 43rd percentileMichael Stone: Assists, 0.19 a game, 47th percentileMichael Stone: Points, 0.23 a game, 47th percentileMichael Stone: Shots, 1.27 a game, 52nd percentileMichael Stone: Hits, 1.95 a game, 80th percentileMichael Stone: Corsi for %, 43.3%, 1st percentileMichael Stone: CF% rel, -5.5, 6th percentileMichael Stone: On-ice xG %, 41.9%, 2nd percentileMichael Stone: Rating, -1.7 goals above replacement, 10th percentileMichael Stone: Chances created, 0.14 xG per 60, 24th percentileMichael Stone: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 11th percentileMichael Stone: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 58th percentile
051015204060Dan Girardi 15Michael Stone 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Dan Girardi
Michael Stone

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Dan Girardi D, TBL 2016-17 Michael Stone D, CGY
63 Games played 64
4 Goals 3
11 Assists 12
15 Points 15
0.24 Points per game 0.23
8 Plus/minus 0
56 Shots 81
7.1 Shooting % 3.7
107 Hits 125
16 Penalty minutes 32
19:06 Average ice time 19:49
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.2 Corsi for % 43.3
-5.3 CF% relative to team -5.5
46.3 Fenwick for % 42.7
46.1 Expected goals for % 41.9
-4.2 xGF% relative to team -3.4
46.1 Goals for % 50.0
99.9 PDO 101.9
117 Shot attempts taken 150
Expected goals, all situations
1.8 Expected goals 2.9
0.09 Expected goals per 60 0.14
2.2% Chance per attempt 2.3%
+2.2 Goals above expected +0.1
Rating, in goals
-0.6 Goals above replacement -1.7
-0.1 Wins above replacement -0.3
-3.3 Even-strength offence -2.2
-1.4 Even-strength defence -2.2
-0.1 Power play -0.6
0.0 Penalty kill +0.5
+0.1 Penalties -1.5
Contract
$5.5M Cap hit $4M
$367K Cap dollars per point $267K
$195K Worth at the going rate -$506K
-$5.3M Value: worth minus cap hit -$4.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean