Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Chris Conner Carson McMillan

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Conner: Goals, 0.13 a game, 39th percentileChris Conner: Assists, 0.25 a game, 57th percentileChris Conner: Points, 0.38 a game, 50th percentileChris Conner: Shots, 1.25 a game, 30th percentileChris Conner: Hits, 0.50 a game, 14th percentileChris Conner: Corsi for %, 47.4%, 27th percentileChris Conner: CF% rel, -10.7, 1st percentileChris Conner: On-ice xG %, 45.4%, 14th percentileChris Conner: Rating, +0.5 goals above replacement, 28th percentileChris Conner: Chances created, 0.57 xG per 60, 24th percentileChris Conner: Shot quality, 5.8% a shot, 8th percentileChris Conner: Finishing, +0.2 goals above expected, 54th percentileCarson McMillan: Goals, 0.09 a game, 30th percentileCarson McMillan: Assists, 0.18 a game, 43rd percentileCarson McMillan: Points, 0.27 a game, 37th percentileCarson McMillan: Shots, 0.73 a game, 7th percentileCarson McMillan: Hits, 1.73 a game, 80th percentileCarson McMillan: Corsi for %, 40.0%, 1st percentileCarson McMillan: CF% rel, -11.1, 1st percentileCarson McMillan: On-ice xG %, 37.5%, 1st percentileCarson McMillan: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 16th percentileCarson McMillan: Chances created, 0.40 xG per 60, 3rd percentileCarson McMillan: Shot quality, 5.8% a shot, 10th percentileCarson McMillan: Finishing, +0.2 goals above expected, 54th percentile
0123Chris Conner 3Carson McMillan 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Conner
Carson McMillan

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Conner R, WSH 2011-12 Carson McMillan R, MIN
8 Games played 11
1 Goals 1
2 Assists 2
3 Points 3
0.38 Points per game 0.27
2 Plus/minus 1
10 Shots 8
10.0 Shooting % 12.5
4 Hits 19
0 Penalty minutes 11
10:34 Average ice time 11:04
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.4 Corsi for % 40.0
-10.7 CF% relative to team -11.1
50.0 Fenwick for % 44.8
45.4 Expected goals for % 37.5
-9.5 xGF% relative to team -15.7
75.0 Goals for % 57.1
105.3 PDO 103.8
16 Shot attempts taken 19
Expected goals, all situations
0.8 Expected goals 0.8
0.57 Expected goals per 60 0.40
5.8% Chance per attempt 5.8%
+0.2 Goals above expected +0.2
Rating, in goals
+0.5 Goals above replacement -0.8
+0.1 Wins above replacement -0.1
+0.3 Even-strength offence -0.6
0.0 Even-strength defence +0.2
0.0 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill -0.2
+0.0 Penalties -0.5

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean