Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Mike Weber Mattias Ekholm

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMike Weber: Goals, 0.01 a game, 11th percentileMike Weber: Assists, 0.12 a game, 17th percentileMike Weber: Points, 0.13 a game, 13th percentileMike Weber: Shots, 0.69 a game, 10th percentileMike Weber: Hits, 3.06 a game, 96th percentileMike Weber: Corsi for %, 40.7%, 1st percentileMike Weber: CF% rel, -3.6, 16th percentileMike Weber: On-ice xG %, 39.1%, 1st percentileMike Weber: Rating, -4.1 goals above replacement, 3rd percentileMike Weber: Chances created, 0.07 xG per 60, 4th percentileMike Weber: Shot quality, 1.9% a shot, 1st percentileMike Weber: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 41st percentileMattias Ekholm: Goals, 0.02 a game, 13th percentileMattias Ekholm: Assists, 0.13 a game, 22nd percentileMattias Ekholm: Points, 0.15 a game, 16th percentileMattias Ekholm: Shots, 0.94 a game, 23rd percentileMattias Ekholm: Hits, 0.68 a game, 19th percentileMattias Ekholm: Corsi for %, 50.1%, 49th percentileMattias Ekholm: CF% rel, 1.2, 68th percentileMattias Ekholm: On-ice xG %, 53.5%, 80th percentileMattias Ekholm: Rating, +4.2 goals above replacement, 68th percentileMattias Ekholm: Chances created, 0.12 xG per 60, 20th percentileMattias Ekholm: Shot quality, 2.6% a shot, 22nd percentileMattias Ekholm: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 31st percentile
02468204060Mike Weber 9Mattias Ekholm 9

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Mike Weber
Mattias Ekholm

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Mike Weber D, WSH 2013-14 Mattias Ekholm D, EDM
68 Games played 62
1 Goals 1
8 Assists 8
9 Points 9
0.13 Points per game 0.15
-29 Plus/minus -8
47 Shots 58
2.1 Shooting % 1.7
208 Hits 42
73 Penalty minutes 10
17:49 Average ice time 16:49
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
40.7 Corsi for % 50.1
-3.6 CF% relative to team +1.2
40.7 Fenwick for % 50.8
39.1 Expected goals for % 53.5
-4.7 xGF% relative to team +2.3
30.3 Goals for % 44.7
96.5 PDO 97.1
128 Shot attempts taken 111
Expected goals, all situations
1.5 Expected goals 2.1
0.07 Expected goals per 60 0.12
1.9% Chance per attempt 2.6%
-0.5 Goals above expected -1.1
Rating, in goals
-4.1 Goals above replacement +4.2
-0.7 Wins above replacement +0.7
-4.7 Even-strength offence -1.8
-0.4 Even-strength defence +2.1
0.0 Power play -0.2
-0.2 Penalty kill +0.5
-2.8 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$1.667M Cap hit $900K
$185K Cap dollars per point $100K
-$1.8M Worth at the going rate $2.9M
-$3.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean