Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Mike Weber Chris Tanev

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMike Weber: Goals, 0.02 a game, 31st percentileMike Weber: Assists, 0.14 a game, 32nd percentileMike Weber: Points, 0.17 a game, 29th percentileMike Weber: Shots, 0.60 a game, 8th percentileMike Weber: Hits, 2.90 a game, 97th percentileMike Weber: Corsi for %, 40.7%, 1st percentileMike Weber: CF% rel, -5.5, 6th percentileMike Weber: On-ice xG %, 39.3%, 1st percentileMike Weber: Rating, -3.2 goals above replacement, 2nd percentileMike Weber: Chances created, 0.06 xG per 60, 3rd percentileMike Weber: Shot quality, 2.2% a shot, 7th percentileMike Weber: Finishing, +0.2 goals above expected, 57th percentileChris Tanev: Goals, 0.05 a game, 49th percentileChris Tanev: Assists, 0.13 a game, 29th percentileChris Tanev: Points, 0.18 a game, 32nd percentileChris Tanev: Shots, 0.53 a game, 6th percentileChris Tanev: Hits, 0.37 a game, 3rd percentileChris Tanev: Corsi for %, 51.7%, 69th percentileChris Tanev: CF% rel, -1.1, 39th percentileChris Tanev: On-ice xG %, 50.6%, 58th percentileChris Tanev: Rating, +3.0 goals above replacement, 76th percentileChris Tanev: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 12th percentileChris Tanev: Shot quality, 3.0% a shot, 41st percentileChris Tanev: Finishing, +1.0 goals above expected, 74th percentile
02462040Mike Weber 7Chris Tanev 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Mike Weber
Chris Tanev

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Mike Weber D, WSH 2012-13 Chris Tanev D, TOR
42 Games played 38
1 Goals 2
6 Assists 5
7 Points 7
0.17 Points per game 0.18
3 Plus/minus 4
25 Shots 20
4.0 Shooting % 10.0
122 Hits 14
70 Penalty minutes 10
18:22 Average ice time 17:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
40.7 Corsi for % 51.7
-5.5 CF% relative to team -1.1
41.1 Fenwick for % 51.6
39.3 Expected goals for % 50.6
-5.4 xGF% relative to team -1.1
48.8 Goals for % 54.8
102.0 PDO 100.8
53 Shot attempts taken 54
Expected goals, all situations
0.8 Expected goals 1.0
0.06 Expected goals per 60 0.09
2.2% Chance per attempt 3.0%
+0.2 Goals above expected +1.0
Rating, in goals
-3.2 Goals above replacement +3.0
-0.5 Wins above replacement +0.5
-2.8 Even-strength offence -2.1
+0.3 Even-strength defence +2.1
-0.1 Power play 0.0
-1.2 Penalty kill +0.3
-1.9 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$950K Cap hit $900K
$136K Cap dollars per point $129K
-$2.3M Worth at the going rate $3.1M
-$3.2M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean