Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Chad Johnson Kari Lehtonen

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerChad Johnson: Save %, 0.891, 2nd percentileChad Johnson: Goals against, 2.92 a game, 15th percentileChad Johnson: Workload, 26.7 shots a game, 12th percentileChad Johnson: Games, 36 games, 40th percentileChad Johnson: Goals saved, -0.82 above expected per 60, 1st percentileKari Lehtonen: Save %, 0.912, 48th percentileKari Lehtonen: Goals against, 2.24 a game, 85th percentileKari Lehtonen: Workload, 25.6 shots a game, 5th percentileKari Lehtonen: Games, 37 games, 42nd percentileKari Lehtonen: Goals saved, -0.06 above expected per 60, 38th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 60 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Chad Johnson G, ANA 2017-18 Kari Lehtonen G, DAL
36 Games played 37
10 Wins 15
16 Losses 14
0 Shutouts 1
962 Shots against 946
857 Saves 863
105 Goals against 83
0.891 Save % 0.912
3.55 Goals against average 2.56
Expected goals, while he was in net
80.9 Expected goals against 81.0
-24.1 Goals saved above expected -2.0
-0.82 Saved above expected per 60 -0.06
6.1% Chance per attempt faced 6.1%
Rating, in goals
-15.9 Goals above replacement +6.2
-2.6 Wins above replacement +1.0
Contract
$2.5M Cap hit $5.9M
-$3M Worth at the going rate $2M
-$5.5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean