Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Chad Johnson Jonathan Bernier

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerChad Johnson: Save %, 0.910, 29th percentileChad Johnson: Goals against, 2.42 a game, 47th percentileChad Johnson: Workload, 26.9 shots a game, 35th percentileChad Johnson: Games, 36 games, 33rd percentileChad Johnson: Goals saved, +0.03 above expected per 60, 53rd percentileJonathan Bernier: Save %, 0.915, 56th percentileJonathan Bernier: Goals against, 2.13 a game, 78th percentileJonathan Bernier: Workload, 25.2 shots a game, 15th percentileJonathan Bernier: Games, 39 games, 38th percentileJonathan Bernier: Goals saved, +0.15 above expected per 60, 67th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Chad Johnson G, ANA 2016-17 Jonathan Bernier G, NJD
36 Games played 39
18 Wins 21
15 Losses 7
3 Shutouts 2
969 Shots against 982
882 Saves 899
87 Goals against 83
0.910 Save % 0.915
2.59 Goals against average 2.50
Expected goals, while he was in net
88.0 Expected goals against 88.0
+1.0 Goals saved above expected +5.0
+0.03 Saved above expected per 60 +0.15
6.3% Chance per attempt faced 5.9%
Rating, in goals
+10.0 Goals above replacement +13.9
+1.7 Wins above replacement +2.3
Contract
$1.7M Cap hit $4.15M
$2.7M Worth at the going rate $3.6M
+$1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$555K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean