Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Trevor Lewis Sam Gagner

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTrevor Lewis: Goals, 0.11 a game, 31st percentileTrevor Lewis: Assists, 0.11 a game, 21st percentileTrevor Lewis: Points, 0.21 a game, 25th percentileTrevor Lewis: Shots, 2.23 a game, 77th percentileTrevor Lewis: Hits, 2.24 a game, 88th percentileTrevor Lewis: Corsi for %, 55.7%, 94th percentileTrevor Lewis: CF% rel, -1.1, 34th percentileTrevor Lewis: On-ice xG %, 56.2%, 92nd percentileTrevor Lewis: Rating, +1.7 goals above replacement, 40th percentileTrevor Lewis: Chances created, 0.87 xG per 60, 78th percentileTrevor Lewis: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 35th percentileTrevor Lewis: Finishing, -9.8 goals above expected, 1st percentileSam Gagner: Goals, 0.15 a game, 47th percentileSam Gagner: Assists, 0.15 a game, 34th percentileSam Gagner: Points, 0.30 a game, 40th percentileSam Gagner: Shots, 1.62 a game, 51st percentileSam Gagner: Hits, 0.32 a game, 6th percentileSam Gagner: Corsi for %, 51.6%, 67th percentileSam Gagner: CF% rel, 2.1, 67th percentileSam Gagner: On-ice xG %, 47.8%, 33rd percentileSam Gagner: Rating, +0.0 goals above replacement, 24th percentileSam Gagner: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 16th percentileSam Gagner: Shot quality, 5.2% a shot, 1st percentileSam Gagner: Finishing, +1.6 goals above expected, 71st percentile
051015204060Trevor Lewis 16Sam Gagner 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Trevor Lewis
Sam Gagner

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Trevor Lewis C, LAK 2015-16 Sam Gagner C, EDM
75 Games played 53
8 Goals 8
8 Assists 8
16 Points 16
0.21 Points per game 0.30
-10 Plus/minus 4
167 Shots 86
4.8 Shooting % 9.3
168 Hits 17
20 Penalty minutes 25
14:34 Average ice time 13:52
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
55.7 Corsi for % 51.6
-1.1 CF% relative to team +2.1
57.5 Fenwick for % 51.2
56.2 Expected goals for % 47.8
+1.1 xGF% relative to team +0.0
40.7 Goals for % 55.0
95.8 PDO 101.5
230 Shot attempts taken 135
Expected goals, all situations
15.8 Expected goals 6.4
0.87 Expected goals per 60 0.52
7.1% Chance per attempt 5.2%
-9.8 Goals above expected +1.6
Rating, in goals
+1.7 Goals above replacement +0.0
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.0
-2.0 Even-strength offence -1.4
+0.9 Even-strength defence -0.1
+0.1 Power play -0.8
-0.4 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.1 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$1.525M Cap hit $4.8M
$95K Cap dollars per point $300K
$1.6M Worth at the going rate $582K
+$88K Value: worth minus cap hit -$4.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean