Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Steve Mason Peter Budaj

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerSteve Mason: Save %, 0.908, 20th percentileSteve Mason: Goals against, 2.47 a game, 42nd percentileSteve Mason: Workload, 26.8 shots a game, 33rd percentileSteve Mason: Games, 58 games, 71st percentileSteve Mason: Goals saved, -0.16 above expected per 60, 16th percentilePeter Budaj: Save %, 0.915, 53rd percentilePeter Budaj: Goals against, 2.00 a game, 91st percentilePeter Budaj: Workload, 23.6 shots a game, 4th percentilePeter Budaj: Games, 60 games, 76th percentilePeter Budaj: Goals saved, +0.05 above expected per 60, 55th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Steve Mason G, WPG 2016-17 Peter Budaj G, LAK
58 Games played 60
26 Wins 30
21 Losses 21
3 Shutouts 7
1,556 Shots against 1,414
1,413 Saves 1,294
143 Goals against 120
0.908 Save % 0.915
2.66 Goals against average 2.18
Expected goals, while he was in net
134.7 Expected goals against 122.8
-8.3 Goals saved above expected +2.8
-0.16 Saved above expected per 60 +0.05
6.2% Chance per attempt faced 6.1%
Rating, in goals
+5.4 Goals above replacement +15.3
+0.9 Wins above replacement +2.6
Contract
$4.1M Cap hit $600K
$1.7M Worth at the going rate $3.9M
-$2.4M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean