Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Steve Mason Mike Smith

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerSteve Mason: Save %, 0.917, 60th percentileSteve Mason: Goals against, 2.38 a game, 51st percentileSteve Mason: Workload, 28.7 shots a game, 65th percentileSteve Mason: Games, 61 games, 88th percentileSteve Mason: Goals saved, -0.13 above expected per 60, 32nd percentileMike Smith: Save %, 0.915, 54th percentileMike Smith: Goals against, 2.56 a game, 31st percentileMike Smith: Workload, 30.2 shots a game, 86th percentileMike Smith: Games, 62 games, 89th percentileMike Smith: Goals saved, +0.13 above expected per 60, 63rd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 65 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Steve Mason G, WPG 2013-14 Mike Smith G, EDM
61 Games played 62
33 Wins 27
18 Losses 21
4 Shutouts 3
1,751 Shots against 1,871
1,606 Saves 1,712
145 Goals against 159
0.917 Save % 0.915
2.50 Goals against average 2.64
Expected goals, while he was in net
137.4 Expected goals against 167.0
-7.6 Goals saved above expected +8.0
-0.13 Saved above expected per 60 +0.13
5.8% Chance per attempt faced 6.5%
Rating, in goals
+6.4 Goals above replacement +25.0
+1.1 Wins above replacement +4.2
Contract
$1.5M Cap hit $5.667M
$1.8M Worth at the going rate $5.6M
+$326K Value: worth minus cap hit -$97K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean