Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Steve Mason Cam Ward

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerSteve Mason: Save %, 0.918, 55th percentileSteve Mason: Goals against, 2.44 a game, 42nd percentileSteve Mason: Workload, 29.7 shots a game, 85th percentileSteve Mason: Games, 54 games, 71st percentileSteve Mason: Goals saved, +0.09 above expected per 60, 61st percentileCam Ward: Save %, 0.909, 31st percentileCam Ward: Goals against, 2.35 a game, 53rd percentileCam Ward: Workload, 25.8 shots a game, 16th percentileCam Ward: Games, 52 games, 69th percentileCam Ward: Goals saved, -0.04 above expected per 60, 40th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Steve Mason G, WPG 2015-16 Cam Ward G, CHI
54 Games played 52
23 Wins 23
19 Losses 17
4 Shutouts 1
1,602 Shots against 1,343
1,470 Saves 1,221
132 Goals against 122
0.918 Save % 0.909
2.51 Goals against average 2.41
Expected goals, while he was in net
136.6 Expected goals against 119.9
+4.6 Goals saved above expected -2.1
+0.09 Saved above expected per 60 -0.04
6.4% Chance per attempt faced 6.3%
Rating, in goals
+18.6 Goals above replacement +10.1
+3.1 Wins above replacement +1.7
Contract
$4.1M Cap hit $6.3M
$5M Worth at the going rate $3M
+$912K Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean