Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Steve Mason Mike Condon

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerSteve Mason: Save %, 0.918, 55th percentileSteve Mason: Goals against, 2.44 a game, 42nd percentileSteve Mason: Workload, 29.7 shots a game, 85th percentileSteve Mason: Games, 54 games, 71st percentileSteve Mason: Goals saved, +0.09 above expected per 60, 61st percentileMike Condon: Save %, 0.903, 11th percentileMike Condon: Goals against, 2.56 a game, 19th percentileMike Condon: Workload, 26.5 shots a game, 31st percentileMike Condon: Games, 55 games, 74th percentileMike Condon: Goals saved, -0.32 above expected per 60, 11th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Steve Mason G, WPG 2015-16 Mike Condon G, OTT
54 Games played 55
23 Wins 21
19 Losses 25
4 Shutouts 1
1,602 Shots against 1,458
1,470 Saves 1,317
132 Goals against 141
0.918 Save % 0.903
2.51 Goals against average 2.71
Expected goals, while he was in net
136.6 Expected goals against 124.6
+4.6 Goals saved above expected -16.4
+0.09 Saved above expected per 60 -0.32
6.4% Chance per attempt faced 6.2%
Rating, in goals
+18.6 Goals above replacement -3.7
+3.1 Wins above replacement -0.6
Contract
$4.1M Cap hit $575K
$5M Worth at the going rate -$312K
+$912K Value: worth minus cap hit -$887K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean