Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Ryan White Adam Cracknell

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRyan White: Goals, 0.14 a game, 39th percentileRyan White: Assists, 0.11 a game, 21st percentileRyan White: Points, 0.25 a game, 27th percentileRyan White: Shots, 0.92 a game, 12th percentileRyan White: Hits, 2.88 a game, 97th percentileRyan White: Corsi for %, 45.3%, 10th percentileRyan White: CF% rel, -3.2, 17th percentileRyan White: On-ice xG %, 40.5%, 2nd percentileRyan White: Rating, -1.7 goals above replacement, 8th percentileRyan White: Chances created, 0.40 xG per 60, 3rd percentileRyan White: Shot quality, 5.7% a shot, 3rd percentileRyan White: Finishing, +4.4 goals above expected, 85th percentileAdam Cracknell: Goals, 0.14 a game, 41st percentileAdam Cracknell: Assists, 0.09 a game, 14th percentileAdam Cracknell: Points, 0.23 a game, 24th percentileAdam Cracknell: Shots, 1.26 a game, 29th percentileAdam Cracknell: Hits, 1.32 a game, 66th percentileAdam Cracknell: Corsi for %, 51.0%, 60th percentileAdam Cracknell: CF% rel, 1.6, 63rd percentileAdam Cracknell: On-ice xG %, 50.1%, 50th percentileAdam Cracknell: Rating, +4.4 goals above replacement, 64th percentileAdam Cracknell: Chances created, 0.67 xG per 60, 41st percentileAdam Cracknell: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 14th percentileAdam Cracknell: Finishing, +1.9 goals above expected, 70th percentile
051015204060Ryan White 16Adam Cracknell 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Ryan White
Adam Cracknell

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Ryan White C, MIN 2016-17 Adam Cracknell R, ANA
65 Games played 69
9 Goals 10
7 Assists 6
16 Points 16
0.25 Points per game 0.23
-16 Plus/minus 9
60 Shots 87
15.0 Shooting % 11.5
187 Hits 91
84 Penalty minutes 12
10:39 Average ice time 10:28
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.3 Corsi for % 51.0
-3.2 CF% relative to team +1.6
45.0 Fenwick for % 52.0
40.5 Expected goals for % 50.1
-7.5 xGF% relative to team +1.0
36.8 Goals for % 56.5
96.4 PDO 101.4
102 Shot attempts taken 158
Expected goals, all situations
4.6 Expected goals 8.1
0.40 Expected goals per 60 0.67
5.7% Chance per attempt 6.4%
+4.4 Goals above expected +1.9
Rating, in goals
-1.7 Goals above replacement +4.4
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.7
-2.5 Even-strength offence -1.1
-0.7 Even-strength defence +1.8
-0.1 Power play -0.1
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.4 Penalties +1.7
Contract
$1M Cap hit $600K
$63K Cap dollars per point $38K
-$525K Worth at the going rate $3.4M
-$1.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.8M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean