Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Matt Beleskey Nate Thompson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatt Beleskey: Goals, 0.06 a game, 17th percentileMatt Beleskey: Assists, 0.16 a game, 36th percentileMatt Beleskey: Points, 0.21 a game, 26th percentileMatt Beleskey: Shots, 1.07 a game, 22nd percentileMatt Beleskey: Hits, 1.49 a game, 69th percentileMatt Beleskey: Corsi for %, 46.3%, 16th percentileMatt Beleskey: CF% rel, -2.7, 23rd percentileMatt Beleskey: On-ice xG %, 44.0%, 7th percentileMatt Beleskey: Rating, -1.5 goals above replacement, 10th percentileMatt Beleskey: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 18th percentileMatt Beleskey: Shot quality, 5.7% a shot, 6th percentileMatt Beleskey: Finishing, -2.3 goals above expected, 30th percentileNate Thompson: Goals, 0.13 a game, 42nd percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.09 a game, 19th percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.22 a game, 28th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.25 a game, 30th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 1.57 a game, 74th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 44.7%, 9th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -4.6, 12th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 47.4%, 28th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +2.7 goals above replacement, 50th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.48 xG per 60, 12th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 56th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, +0.9 goals above expected, 58th percentile
051015204060Matt Beleskey 15Nate Thompson 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matt Beleskey
Nate Thompson

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matt Beleskey L, NYR 2011-12 Nate Thompson C, PHI
70 Games played 68
4 Goals 9
11 Assists 6
15 Points 15
0.21 Points per game 0.22
-2 Plus/minus -23
75 Shots 85
5.3 Shooting % 10.6
104 Hits 107
72 Penalty minutes 21
10:16 Average ice time 14:49
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.3 Corsi for % 44.7
-2.7 CF% relative to team -4.6
46.0 Fenwick for % 46.0
44.0 Expected goals for % 47.4
-4.9 xGF% relative to team -1.5
48.0 Goals for % 31.1
100.8 PDO 93.9
153 Shot attempts taken 121
Expected goals, all situations
6.3 Expected goals 8.1
0.52 Expected goals per 60 0.48
5.7% Chance per attempt 7.6%
-2.3 Goals above expected +0.9
Rating, in goals
-1.5 Goals above replacement +2.7
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.4
-2.3 Even-strength offence -3.7
-1.1 Even-strength defence +3.4
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.2
-0.1 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$738K Cap hit $900K
$49K Cap dollars per point $60K
-$193K Worth at the going rate $1.7M
-$931K Value: worth minus cap hit +$815K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean