Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Matt Beleskey William Carrier

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatt Beleskey: Goals, 0.06 a game, 11th percentileMatt Beleskey: Assists, 0.10 a game, 20th percentileMatt Beleskey: Points, 0.16 a game, 12th percentileMatt Beleskey: Shots, 1.61 a game, 48th percentileMatt Beleskey: Hits, 2.00 a game, 86th percentileMatt Beleskey: Corsi for %, 53.6%, 83rd percentileMatt Beleskey: CF% rel, -1.2, 35th percentileMatt Beleskey: On-ice xG %, 53.4%, 75th percentileMatt Beleskey: Rating, -2.6 goals above replacement, 3rd percentileMatt Beleskey: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 18th percentileMatt Beleskey: Shot quality, 5.3% a shot, 1st percentileMatt Beleskey: Finishing, -3.0 goals above expected, 20th percentileWilliam Carrier: Goals, 0.12 a game, 33rd percentileWilliam Carrier: Assists, 0.07 a game, 12th percentileWilliam Carrier: Points, 0.20 a game, 17th percentileWilliam Carrier: Shots, 1.22 a game, 27th percentileWilliam Carrier: Hits, 2.73 a game, 97th percentileWilliam Carrier: Corsi for %, 51.4%, 65th percentileWilliam Carrier: CF% rel, 4.3, 88th percentileWilliam Carrier: On-ice xG %, 50.9%, 57th percentileWilliam Carrier: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 35th percentileWilliam Carrier: Chances created, 0.69 xG per 60, 43rd percentileWilliam Carrier: Shot quality, 6.5% a shot, 15th percentileWilliam Carrier: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 61st percentile
024682040Matt Beleskey 8William Carrier 8

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matt Beleskey
William Carrier

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matt Beleskey L, NYR 2016-17 William Carrier L, CAR
49 Games played 41
3 Goals 5
5 Assists 3
8 Points 8
0.16 Points per game 0.20
-10 Plus/minus -1
79 Shots 50
3.8 Shooting % 10.0
98 Hits 112
47 Penalty minutes 21
13:16 Average ice time 9:00
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.6 Corsi for % 51.4
-1.2 CF% relative to team +4.3
55.4 Fenwick for % 51.0
53.4 Expected goals for % 50.9
-1.2 xGF% relative to team +3.9
35.3 Goals for % 47.8
94.1 PDO 99.6
132 Shot attempts taken 72
Expected goals, all situations
6.0 Expected goals 4.2
0.55 Expected goals per 60 0.69
5.3% Chance per attempt 6.5%
-3.0 Goals above expected +0.8
Rating, in goals
-2.6 Goals above replacement +1.5
-0.4 Wins above replacement +0.2
-3.1 Even-strength offence +0.1
+0.6 Even-strength defence +0.0
-0.7 Power play 0.0
+0.1 Penalty kill 0.0
-1.3 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$3.8M Cap hit $689K
$475K Cap dollars per point $86K
-$1.1M Worth at the going rate $1.5M
-$4.9M Value: worth minus cap hit +$813K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean