Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Cal Clutterbuck Nathan Gerbe

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerCal Clutterbuck: Goals, 0.10 a game, 31st percentileCal Clutterbuck: Assists, 0.14 a game, 29th percentileCal Clutterbuck: Points, 0.24 a game, 27th percentileCal Clutterbuck: Shots, 2.07 a game, 70th percentileCal Clutterbuck: Hits, 3.69 a game, 98th percentileCal Clutterbuck: Corsi for %, 48.7%, 38th percentileCal Clutterbuck: CF% rel, -1.5, 36th percentileCal Clutterbuck: On-ice xG %, 50.2%, 53rd percentileCal Clutterbuck: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 50th percentileCal Clutterbuck: Chances created, 0.61 xG per 60, 33rd percentileCal Clutterbuck: Shot quality, 5.1% a shot, 2nd percentileCal Clutterbuck: Finishing, -1.8 goals above expected, 26th percentileNathan Gerbe: Goals, 0.12 a game, 36th percentileNathan Gerbe: Assists, 0.12 a game, 24th percentileNathan Gerbe: Points, 0.24 a game, 27th percentileNathan Gerbe: Shots, 1.52 a game, 46th percentileNathan Gerbe: Hits, 0.76 a game, 30th percentileNathan Gerbe: Corsi for %, 41.7%, 4th percentileNathan Gerbe: CF% rel, -4.2, 16th percentileNathan Gerbe: On-ice xG %, 39.4%, 2nd percentileNathan Gerbe: Rating, -1.3 goals above replacement, 9th percentileNathan Gerbe: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 21st percentileNathan Gerbe: Shot quality, 5.6% a shot, 6th percentileNathan Gerbe: Finishing, +0.3 goals above expected, 56th percentile
02468102040Cal Clutterbuck 10Nathan Gerbe 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Cal Clutterbuck
Nathan Gerbe

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Cal Clutterbuck R, NYI 2012-13 Nathan Gerbe C, CBJ
42 Games played 42
4 Goals 5
6 Assists 5
10 Points 10
0.24 Points per game 0.24
-5 Plus/minus -3
87 Shots 64
4.6 Shooting % 7.8
155 Hits 32
27 Penalty minutes 14
13:44 Average ice time 12:30
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.7 Corsi for % 41.7
-1.5 CF% relative to team -4.2
49.3 Fenwick for % 42.5
50.2 Expected goals for % 39.4
-4.1 xGF% relative to team -5.3
36.0 Goals for % 42.9
96.6 PDO 99.8
125 Shot attempts taken 98
Expected goals, all situations
5.8 Expected goals 4.7
0.61 Expected goals per 60 0.54
5.1% Chance per attempt 5.6%
-1.8 Goals above expected +0.3
Rating, in goals
+2.0 Goals above replacement -1.3
+0.3 Wins above replacement -0.2
-2.5 Even-strength offence -1.7
+1.6 Even-strength defence -0.8
0.0 Power play -0.5
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.9 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$1.4M Cap hit $1.45M
$140K Cap dollars per point $145K
$2.2M Worth at the going rate -$601K
+$815K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean