Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Jonathan Bernier Mike Condon

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerJonathan Bernier: Save %, 0.915, 56th percentileJonathan Bernier: Goals against, 2.13 a game, 78th percentileJonathan Bernier: Workload, 25.2 shots a game, 15th percentileJonathan Bernier: Games, 39 games, 38th percentileJonathan Bernier: Goals saved, +0.15 above expected per 60, 67th percentileMike Condon: Save %, 0.914, 45th percentileMike Condon: Goals against, 2.34 a game, 60th percentileMike Condon: Workload, 27.4 shots a game, 38th percentileMike Condon: Games, 41 games, 45th percentileMike Condon: Goals saved, +0.02 above expected per 60, 51st percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Jonathan Bernier G, NJD 2016-17 Mike Condon G, OTT
39 Games played 41
21 Wins 19
7 Losses 14
2 Shutouts 5
982 Shots against 1,122
899 Saves 1,026
83 Goals against 96
0.915 Save % 0.914
2.50 Goals against average 2.48
Expected goals, while he was in net
88.0 Expected goals against 96.7
+5.0 Goals saved above expected +0.7
+0.15 Saved above expected per 60 +0.02
5.9% Chance per attempt faced 5.9%
Rating, in goals
+13.9 Goals above replacement +10.6
+2.3 Wins above replacement +1.8
Contract
$4.15M Cap hit $575K
$3.6M Worth at the going rate $2.9M
-$555K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean