Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Michael Frolik Riley Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMichael Frolik: Goals, 0.11 a game, 23rd percentileMichael Frolik: Assists, 0.14 a game, 21st percentileMichael Frolik: Points, 0.25 a game, 22nd percentileMichael Frolik: Shots, 1.23 a game, 24th percentileMichael Frolik: Hits, 0.56 a game, 24th percentileMichael Frolik: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 35th percentileMichael Frolik: CF% rel, -0.5, 38th percentileMichael Frolik: On-ice xG %, 45.8%, 16th percentileMichael Frolik: Rating, -1.7 goals above replacement, 7th percentileMichael Frolik: Chances created, 0.46 xG per 60, 5th percentileMichael Frolik: Shot quality, 5.7% a shot, 1st percentileMichael Frolik: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 49th percentileRiley Nash: Goals, 0.08 a game, 11th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.14 a game, 21st percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.22 a game, 16th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.00 a game, 12th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.06 a game, 55th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 44.9%, 9th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -5.4, 8th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 49.8%, 44th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +2.1 goals above replacement, 46th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.43 xG per 60, 3rd percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 28th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 49th percentile
0510204060Michael Frolik 14Riley Nash 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Michael Frolik
Riley Nash

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Michael Frolik R, MTL 2019-20 Riley Nash C, NYR
57 Games played 64
6 Goals 5
8 Assists 9
14 Points 14
0.25 Points per game 0.22
-12 Plus/minus 6
70 Shots 64
8.6 Shooting % 7.8
32 Hits 68
28 Penalty minutes 10
12:26 Average ice time 11:51
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.3 Corsi for % 44.9
-0.5 CF% relative to team -5.4
47.9 Fenwick for % 47.4
45.8 Expected goals for % 49.8
-2.7 xGF% relative to team -2.3
33.3 Goals for % 55.0
96.3 PDO 101.9
118 Shot attempts taken 87
Expected goals, all situations
5.4 Expected goals 5.5
0.46 Expected goals per 60 0.43
5.7% Chance per attempt 7.4%
-0.4 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
-1.7 Goals above replacement +2.1
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.4
-2.6 Even-strength offence -3.6
+0.7 Even-strength defence +3.7
+0.0 Power play -0.1
-0.9 Penalty kill +0.3
-0.9 Penalties -0.3
Contract
$4.3M Cap hit $2.75M
$307K Cap dollars per point $196K
-$725K Worth at the going rate $2.4M
-$5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$301K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean