Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Michael Frolik Austin Watson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMichael Frolik: Goals, 0.11 a game, 23rd percentileMichael Frolik: Assists, 0.14 a game, 21st percentileMichael Frolik: Points, 0.25 a game, 22nd percentileMichael Frolik: Shots, 1.23 a game, 24th percentileMichael Frolik: Hits, 0.56 a game, 24th percentileMichael Frolik: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 35th percentileMichael Frolik: CF% rel, -0.5, 38th percentileMichael Frolik: On-ice xG %, 45.8%, 16th percentileMichael Frolik: Rating, -1.7 goals above replacement, 7th percentileMichael Frolik: Chances created, 0.46 xG per 60, 5th percentileMichael Frolik: Shot quality, 5.7% a shot, 1st percentileMichael Frolik: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 49th percentileAustin Watson: Goals, 0.11 a game, 26th percentileAustin Watson: Assists, 0.15 a game, 26th percentileAustin Watson: Points, 0.26 a game, 24th percentileAustin Watson: Shots, 0.94 a game, 10th percentileAustin Watson: Hits, 2.47 a game, 92nd percentileAustin Watson: Corsi for %, 42.0%, 2nd percentileAustin Watson: CF% rel, -12.3, 1st percentileAustin Watson: On-ice xG %, 37.9%, 1st percentileAustin Watson: Rating, -3.4 goals above replacement, 2nd percentileAustin Watson: Chances created, 0.45 xG per 60, 4th percentileAustin Watson: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 4th percentileAustin Watson: Finishing, +1.4 goals above expected, 69th percentile
05102040Michael Frolik 14Austin Watson 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Michael Frolik
Austin Watson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Michael Frolik R, MTL 2019-20 Austin Watson L, DET
57 Games played 53
6 Goals 6
8 Assists 8
14 Points 14
0.25 Points per game 0.26
-12 Plus/minus -9
70 Shots 50
8.6 Shooting % 12.0
32 Hits 131
28 Penalty minutes 65
12:26 Average ice time 11:37
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.3 Corsi for % 42.0
-0.5 CF% relative to team -12.3
47.9 Fenwick for % 43.8
45.8 Expected goals for % 37.9
-2.7 xGF% relative to team -16.4
33.3 Goals for % 36.0
96.3 PDO 97.1
118 Shot attempts taken 82
Expected goals, all situations
5.4 Expected goals 4.6
0.46 Expected goals per 60 0.45
5.7% Chance per attempt 6.2%
-0.4 Goals above expected +1.4
Rating, in goals
-1.7 Goals above replacement -3.4
-0.3 Wins above replacement -0.6
-2.6 Even-strength offence -5.1
+0.7 Even-strength defence +0.7
+0.0 Power play -0.1
-0.9 Penalty kill +0.1
-0.9 Penalties -0.8
Contract
$4.3M Cap hit $1.1M
$307K Cap dollars per point $79K
-$725K Worth at the going rate -$2.2M
-$5M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean