Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Andreas Nodl Colin Fraser

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAndreas Nodl: Goals, 0.05 a game, 13th percentileAndreas Nodl: Assists, 0.08 a game, 15th percentileAndreas Nodl: Points, 0.13 a game, 13th percentileAndreas Nodl: Shots, 1.10 a game, 23rd percentileAndreas Nodl: Hits, 1.13 a game, 52nd percentileAndreas Nodl: Corsi for %, 47.5%, 28th percentileAndreas Nodl: CF% rel, -2.1, 29th percentileAndreas Nodl: On-ice xG %, 46.3%, 19th percentileAndreas Nodl: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 19th percentileAndreas Nodl: Chances created, 0.58 xG per 60, 25th percentileAndreas Nodl: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 26th percentileAndreas Nodl: Finishing, -3.8 goals above expected, 18th percentileColin Fraser: Goals, 0.03 a game, 7th percentileColin Fraser: Assists, 0.09 a game, 19th percentileColin Fraser: Points, 0.12 a game, 11th percentileColin Fraser: Shots, 0.81 a game, 10th percentileColin Fraser: Hits, 2.22 a game, 91st percentileColin Fraser: Corsi for %, 51.8%, 68th percentileColin Fraser: CF% rel, -4.5, 12th percentileColin Fraser: On-ice xG %, 50.6%, 57th percentileColin Fraser: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 24th percentileColin Fraser: Chances created, 0.53 xG per 60, 19th percentileColin Fraser: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 63rd percentileColin Fraser: Finishing, -3.8 goals above expected, 17th percentile
02468204060Andreas Nodl 8Colin Fraser 8

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Andreas Nodl
Colin Fraser

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Andreas Nodl R, CAR 2011-12 Colin Fraser C, STL
60 Games played 67
3 Goals 2
5 Assists 6
8 Points 8
0.13 Points per game 0.12
-5 Plus/minus -2
66 Shots 54
4.5 Shooting % 3.7
68 Hits 149
8 Penalty minutes 67
11:43 Average ice time 9:44
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.5 Corsi for % 51.8
-2.1 CF% relative to team -4.5
46.9 Fenwick for % 51.1
46.3 Expected goals for % 50.6
-4.5 xGF% relative to team -4.1
40.7 Goals for % 46.4
98.8 PDO 98.6
121 Shot attempts taken 94
Expected goals, all situations
6.8 Expected goals 5.8
0.58 Expected goals per 60 0.53
6.6% Chance per attempt 7.9%
-3.8 Goals above expected -3.8
Rating, in goals
-0.4 Goals above replacement +0.1
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.0
-3.7 Even-strength offence -3.4
+0.9 Even-strength defence +1.5
-0.1 Power play -0.1
0.0 Penalty kill +0.2
+0.7 Penalties +0.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean