Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Andreas Nodl Brad Richardson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerAndreas Nodl: Goals, 0.05 a game, 13th percentileAndreas Nodl: Assists, 0.08 a game, 15th percentileAndreas Nodl: Points, 0.13 a game, 13th percentileAndreas Nodl: Shots, 1.10 a game, 23rd percentileAndreas Nodl: Hits, 1.13 a game, 52nd percentileAndreas Nodl: Corsi for %, 47.5%, 28th percentileAndreas Nodl: CF% rel, -2.1, 29th percentileAndreas Nodl: On-ice xG %, 46.3%, 19th percentileAndreas Nodl: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 19th percentileAndreas Nodl: Chances created, 0.58 xG per 60, 25th percentileAndreas Nodl: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 26th percentileAndreas Nodl: Finishing, -3.8 goals above expected, 18th percentileBrad Richardson: Goals, 0.08 a game, 28th percentileBrad Richardson: Assists, 0.05 a game, 7th percentileBrad Richardson: Points, 0.14 a game, 14th percentileBrad Richardson: Shots, 1.66 a game, 51st percentileBrad Richardson: Hits, 1.10 a game, 49th percentileBrad Richardson: Corsi for %, 58.6%, 98th percentileBrad Richardson: CF% rel, 5.7, 93rd percentileBrad Richardson: On-ice xG %, 54.7%, 85th percentileBrad Richardson: Rating, +3.0 goals above replacement, 53rd percentileBrad Richardson: Chances created, 0.82 xG per 60, 68th percentileBrad Richardson: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 53rd percentileBrad Richardson: Finishing, -5.3 goals above expected, 8th percentile
02468204060Andreas Nodl 8Brad Richardson 8

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Andreas Nodl
Brad Richardson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Andreas Nodl R, CAR 2011-12 Brad Richardson R, VAN
60 Games played 59
3 Goals 5
5 Assists 3
8 Points 8
0.13 Points per game 0.14
-5 Plus/minus -6
66 Shots 98
4.5 Shooting % 5.1
68 Hits 65
8 Penalty minutes 30
11:43 Average ice time 12:52
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.5 Corsi for % 58.6
-2.1 CF% relative to team +5.7
46.9 Fenwick for % 56.8
46.3 Expected goals for % 54.7
-4.5 xGF% relative to team +3.9
40.7 Goals for % 40.0
98.8 PDO 95.4
121 Shot attempts taken 177
Expected goals, all situations
6.8 Expected goals 10.3
0.58 Expected goals per 60 0.82
6.6% Chance per attempt 7.5%
-3.8 Goals above expected -5.3
Rating, in goals
-0.4 Goals above replacement +3.0
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.5
-3.7 Even-strength offence -0.9
+0.9 Even-strength defence +0.6
-0.1 Power play -0.1
0.0 Penalty kill +0.3
+0.7 Penalties +1.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean