Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Erik Condra Kyle Brodziak

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerErik Condra: Goals, 0.08 a game, 23rd percentileErik Condra: Assists, 0.17 a game, 37th percentileErik Condra: Points, 0.25 a game, 28th percentileErik Condra: Shots, 1.52 a game, 44th percentileErik Condra: Hits, 0.25 a game, 3rd percentileErik Condra: Corsi for %, 55.7%, 90th percentileErik Condra: CF% rel, 2.6, 75th percentileErik Condra: On-ice xG %, 58.7%, 94th percentileErik Condra: Rating, +3.7 goals above replacement, 72nd percentileErik Condra: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 54th percentileErik Condra: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 48th percentileErik Condra: Finishing, -3.6 goals above expected, 10th percentileKyle Brodziak: Goals, 0.17 a game, 49th percentileKyle Brodziak: Assists, 0.08 a game, 15th percentileKyle Brodziak: Points, 0.25 a game, 28th percentileKyle Brodziak: Shots, 1.83 a game, 59th percentileKyle Brodziak: Hits, 1.13 a game, 50th percentileKyle Brodziak: Corsi for %, 49.1%, 44th percentileKyle Brodziak: CF% rel, -0.9, 42nd percentileKyle Brodziak: On-ice xG %, 48.4%, 40th percentileKyle Brodziak: Rating, -0.3 goals above replacement, 18th percentileKyle Brodziak: Chances created, 0.64 xG per 60, 40th percentileKyle Brodziak: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 50th percentileKyle Brodziak: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 41st percentile
05102040Erik Condra 12Kyle Brodziak 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Erik Condra
Kyle Brodziak

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Erik Condra R, DAL 2012-13 Kyle Brodziak C, EDM
48 Games played 48
4 Goals 8
8 Assists 4
12 Points 12
0.25 Points per game 0.25
3 Plus/minus -18
73 Shots 88
5.5 Shooting % 9.1
12 Hits 54
34 Penalty minutes 20
13:10 Average ice time 17:21
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
55.7 Corsi for % 49.1
+2.6 CF% relative to team -0.9
55.4 Fenwick for % 49.2
58.7 Expected goals for % 48.4
+7.6 xGF% relative to team -6.4
48.4 Goals for % 34.0
98.3 PDO 93.7
115 Shot attempts taken 119
Expected goals, all situations
7.6 Expected goals 8.9
0.72 Expected goals per 60 0.64
7.4% Chance per attempt 7.4%
-3.6 Goals above expected -0.9
Rating, in goals
+3.7 Goals above replacement -0.3
+0.6 Wins above replacement -0.1
+0.5 Even-strength offence -3.4
+2.5 Even-strength defence -0.6
+0.0 Power play +0.2
-0.6 Penalty kill +0.5
-0.4 Penalties +0.6
Contract
$625K Cap hit $2.833M
$52K Cap dollars per point $236K
$3.7M Worth at the going rate $234K
+$3.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean