Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Erik Condra Andreas Martinsen

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerErik Condra: Goals, 0.11 a game, 32nd percentileErik Condra: Assists, 0.09 a game, 17th percentileErik Condra: Points, 0.20 a game, 23rd percentileErik Condra: Shots, 1.07 a game, 20th percentileErik Condra: Hits, 0.37 a game, 8th percentileErik Condra: Corsi for %, 54.9%, 90th percentileErik Condra: CF% rel, 3.0, 79th percentileErik Condra: On-ice xG %, 54.5%, 82nd percentileErik Condra: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 41st percentileErik Condra: Chances created, 0.51 xG per 60, 15th percentileErik Condra: Shot quality, 6.5% a shot, 20th percentileErik Condra: Finishing, +1.1 goals above expected, 67th percentileAndreas Martinsen: Goals, 0.07 a game, 17th percentileAndreas Martinsen: Assists, 0.13 a game, 27th percentileAndreas Martinsen: Points, 0.20 a game, 22nd percentileAndreas Martinsen: Shots, 0.95 a game, 14th percentileAndreas Martinsen: Hits, 2.82 a game, 95th percentileAndreas Martinsen: Corsi for %, 42.7%, 3rd percentileAndreas Martinsen: CF% rel, -1.9, 27th percentileAndreas Martinsen: On-ice xG %, 40.3%, 2nd percentileAndreas Martinsen: Rating, 0.0 goals above replacement, 24th percentileAndreas Martinsen: Chances created, 0.43 xG per 60, 5th percentileAndreas Martinsen: Shot quality, 5.8% a shot, 5th percentileAndreas Martinsen: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 52nd percentile
05102040Erik Condra 11Andreas Martinsen 11

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Erik Condra
Andreas Martinsen

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Erik Condra R, DAL 2015-16 Andreas Martinsen L, CHI
54 Games played 55
6 Goals 4
5 Assists 7
11 Points 11
0.20 Points per game 0.20
-4 Plus/minus -4
58 Shots 52
10.3 Shooting % 7.7
20 Hits 155
34 Penalty minutes 47
10:42 Average ice time 11:06
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.9 Corsi for % 42.7
+3.0 CF% relative to team -1.9
53.5 Fenwick for % 43.0
54.5 Expected goals for % 40.3
+2.2 xGF% relative to team -4.0
45.2 Goals for % 47.5
96.8 PDO 101.6
88 Shot attempts taken 83
Expected goals, all situations
4.9 Expected goals 4.3
0.51 Expected goals per 60 0.43
6.5% Chance per attempt 5.8%
+1.1 Goals above expected -0.3
Rating, in goals
+1.8 Goals above replacement 0.0
+0.3 Wins above replacement 0.0
-1.3 Even-strength offence -2.8
+2.1 Even-strength defence +1.3
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.6 Penalty kill 0.0
-1.2 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$1.25M Cap hit $742K
$114K Cap dollars per point $67K
$1.7M Worth at the going rate $535K
+$442K Value: worth minus cap hit -$207K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean