Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

David Schlemko Ryan Ellis

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDavid Schlemko: Goals, 0.02 a game, 21st percentileDavid Schlemko: Assists, 0.22 a game, 53rd percentileDavid Schlemko: Points, 0.24 a game, 47th percentileDavid Schlemko: Shots, 1.26 a game, 59th percentileDavid Schlemko: Hits, 1.13 a game, 48th percentileDavid Schlemko: Corsi for %, 48.0%, 34th percentileDavid Schlemko: CF% rel, -3.6, 15th percentileDavid Schlemko: On-ice xG %, 46.9%, 28th percentileDavid Schlemko: Rating, -0.6 goals above replacement, 25th percentileDavid Schlemko: Chances created, 0.15 xG per 60, 40th percentileDavid Schlemko: Shot quality, 2.6% a shot, 22nd percentileDavid Schlemko: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 30th percentileRyan Ellis: Goals, 0.09 a game, 78th percentileRyan Ellis: Assists, 0.25 a game, 64th percentileRyan Ellis: Points, 0.34 a game, 71st percentileRyan Ellis: Shots, 1.06 a game, 43rd percentileRyan Ellis: Hits, 0.94 a game, 37th percentileRyan Ellis: Corsi for %, 50.4%, 57th percentileRyan Ellis: CF% rel, 4.5, 93rd percentileRyan Ellis: On-ice xG %, 48.9%, 42nd percentileRyan Ellis: Rating, +2.2 goals above replacement, 56th percentileRyan Ellis: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 59th percentileRyan Ellis: Shot quality, 3.3% a shot, 55th percentileRyan Ellis: Finishing, +1.4 goals above expected, 79th percentile
05102040David Schlemko 11Ryan Ellis 11

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

David Schlemko
Ryan Ellis

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

David Schlemko D, MTL 2011-12 Ryan Ellis D, CHI
46 Games played 32
1 Goals 3
10 Assists 8
11 Points 11
0.24 Points per game 0.34
7 Plus/minus 5
58 Shots 34
1.7 Shooting % 8.8
52 Hits 30
10 Penalty minutes 4
18:21 Average ice time 14:50
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.0 Corsi for % 50.4
-3.6 CF% relative to team +4.5
49.5 Fenwick for % 50.3
46.9 Expected goals for % 48.9
-3.2 xGF% relative to team -2.0
52.5 Goals for % 58.1
100.4 PDO 102.5
110 Shot attempts taken 50
Expected goals, all situations
2.1 Expected goals 1.6
0.15 Expected goals per 60 0.20
2.6% Chance per attempt 3.3%
-1.1 Goals above expected +1.4
Rating, in goals
-0.6 Goals above replacement +2.2
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.4
-0.6 Even-strength offence +0.1
-2.2 Even-strength defence -0.6
-0.3 Power play 0.0
-0.3 Penalty kill +0.0
0.0 Penalties +1.1
Contract
$550K Cap hit $840K
$50K Cap dollars per point $76K
$211K Worth at the going rate $1.5M
-$339K Value: worth minus cap hit +$648K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean