Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

John Scott Anton Lander

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJohn Scott: Goals, 0.02 a game, 3rd percentileJohn Scott: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileJohn Scott: Points, 0.02 a game, 1st percentileJohn Scott: Shots, 0.29 a game, 1st percentileJohn Scott: Hits, 1.70 a game, 74th percentileJohn Scott: Corsi for %, 39.5%, 1st percentileJohn Scott: CF% rel, -5.0, 10th percentileJohn Scott: On-ice xG %, 35.2%, 1st percentileJohn Scott: Rating, -5.3 goals above replacement, 1st percentileJohn Scott: Chances created, 0.22 xG per 60, 1st percentileJohn Scott: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 44th percentileJohn Scott: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 49th percentileAnton Lander: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAnton Lander: Assists, 0.04 a game, 5th percentileAnton Lander: Points, 0.04 a game, 1st percentileAnton Lander: Shots, 0.67 a game, 7th percentileAnton Lander: Hits, 1.07 a game, 48th percentileAnton Lander: Corsi for %, 44.1%, 10th percentileAnton Lander: CF% rel, 0.1, 48th percentileAnton Lander: On-ice xG %, 39.9%, 3rd percentileAnton Lander: Rating, -0.5 goals above replacement, 19th percentileAnton Lander: Chances created, 0.31 xG per 60, 1st percentileAnton Lander: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 17th percentileAnton Lander: Finishing, -1.9 goals above expected, 32nd percentile
00.20.40.60.812040John Scott 1Anton Lander 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

John Scott
Anton Lander

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

John Scott L, MTL 2013-14 Anton Lander C, EDM
56 Games played 27
1 Goals 0
0 Assists 1
1 Points 1
0.02 Points per game 0.04
-12 Plus/minus -10
16 Shots 18
6.3 Shooting % 0.0
95 Hits 29
125 Penalty minutes 4
6:45 Average ice time 13:38
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
39.5 Corsi for % 44.1
-5.0 CF% relative to team +0.1
40.9 Fenwick for % 43.9
35.2 Expected goals for % 39.9
-7.5 xGF% relative to team -2.8
25.0 Goals for % 26.3
95.2 PDO 95.1
23 Shot attempts taken 32
Expected goals, all situations
1.4 Expected goals 1.9
0.22 Expected goals per 60 0.31
7.2% Chance per attempt 6.4%
-0.4 Goals above expected -1.9
Rating, in goals
-5.3 Goals above replacement -0.5
-0.9 Wins above replacement -0.1
-3.5 Even-strength offence -2.3
-0.1 Even-strength defence +0.2
-0.1 Power play -0.4
0.0 Penalty kill -0.1
-2.7 Penalties +1.0
Contract
$750K Cap hit $880K
$750K Cap dollars per point $880K
-$2.5M Worth at the going rate $227K
-$3.3M Value: worth minus cap hit -$653K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean