Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Trevor Smith Joakim Lindstrom

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTrevor Smith: Goals, 0.13 a game, 39th percentileTrevor Smith: Assists, 0.19 a game, 45th percentileTrevor Smith: Points, 0.31 a game, 42nd percentileTrevor Smith: Shots, 1.06 a game, 21st percentileTrevor Smith: Hits, 1.19 a game, 55th percentileTrevor Smith: Corsi for %, 42.7%, 3rd percentileTrevor Smith: CF% rel, 1.3, 61st percentileTrevor Smith: On-ice xG %, 41.1%, 3rd percentileTrevor Smith: Rating, -0.1 goals above replacement, 22nd percentileTrevor Smith: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 27th percentileTrevor Smith: Shot quality, 9.8% a shot, 97th percentileTrevor Smith: Finishing, +0.0 goals above expected, 53rd percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Goals, 0.13 a game, 39th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Assists, 0.19 a game, 45th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Points, 0.31 a game, 42nd percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Shots, 1.38 a game, 37th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Hits, 0.06 a game, 1st percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Corsi for %, 46.4%, 17th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: CF% rel, -7.9, 3rd percentileJoakim Lindstrom: On-ice xG %, 49.1%, 44th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Rating, 0.0 goals above replacement, 22nd percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 14th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Shot quality, 6.0% a shot, 12th percentileJoakim Lindstrom: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 54th percentile
012345Trevor Smith 5Joakim Lindstrom 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Trevor Smith
Joakim Lindstrom

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Trevor Smith C, NSH 2011-12 Joakim Lindstrom C, TOR
16 Games played 16
2 Goals 2
3 Assists 3
5 Points 5
0.31 Points per game 0.31
2 Plus/minus -9
17 Shots 22
11.8 Shooting % 9.1
19 Hits 1
4 Penalty minutes 0
12:28 Average ice time 13:55
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
42.7 Corsi for % 46.4
+1.3 CF% relative to team -7.9
42.9 Fenwick for % 45.7
41.1 Expected goals for % 49.1
-0.6 xGF% relative to team -6.7
52.9 Goals for % 31.3
105.3 PDO 95.3
24 Shot attempts taken 32
Expected goals, all situations
2.0 Expected goals 1.9
0.59 Expected goals per 60 0.50
9.8% Chance per attempt 6.0%
+0.0 Goals above expected +0.1
Rating, in goals
-0.1 Goals above replacement 0.0
0.0 Wins above replacement 0.0
-0.3 Even-strength offence -1.0
+0.0 Even-strength defence 0.0
-0.2 Power play -0.2
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.1 Penalties +0.5

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean