Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Paul Carey Mike Angelidis

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPaul Carey: Goals, 0.25 a game, 75th percentilePaul Carey: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentilePaul Carey: Points, 0.25 a game, 29th percentilePaul Carey: Shots, 1.25 a game, 30th percentilePaul Carey: Hits, 1.50 a game, 67th percentilePaul Carey: Corsi for %, 48.1%, 30th percentilePaul Carey: CF% rel, -6.8, 4th percentilePaul Carey: On-ice xG %, 41.8%, 4th percentilePaul Carey: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 24th percentilePaul Carey: Chances created, 0.35 xG per 60, 2nd percentilePaul Carey: Shot quality, 4.7% a shot, 1st percentilePaul Carey: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 65th percentileMike Angelidis: Goals, 0.25 a game, 75th percentileMike Angelidis: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileMike Angelidis: Points, 0.25 a game, 29th percentileMike Angelidis: Shots, 0.25 a game, 1st percentileMike Angelidis: Hits, 1.50 a game, 67th percentileMike Angelidis: Corsi for %, 52.8%, 78th percentileMike Angelidis: CF% rel, -4.6, 10th percentileMike Angelidis: On-ice xG %, 47.6%, 30th percentileMike Angelidis: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 24th percentileMike Angelidis: Chances created, 0.88 xG per 60, 79th percentileMike Angelidis: Shot quality, 17.5% a shot, 99th percentileMike Angelidis: Finishing, +0.5 goals above expected, 61st percentile
00.20.40.60.81Paul Carey 1Mike Angelidis 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Paul Carey
Mike Angelidis

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Paul Carey C, BOS 2015-16 Mike Angelidis L, TBL
4 Games played 4
1 Goals 1
0 Assists 0
1 Points 1
0.25 Points per game 0.25
0 Plus/minus 2
5 Shots 1
20.0 Shooting % 100.0
6 Hits 6
0 Penalty minutes 5
9:58 Average ice time 9:00
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.1 Corsi for % 52.8
-6.8 CF% relative to team -4.6
47.6 Fenwick for % 47.1
41.8 Expected goals for % 47.6
-13.2 xGF% relative to team -7.2
50.0 Goals for % 100.0
99.2 PDO 116.7
5 Shot attempts taken 6
Expected goals, all situations
0.2 Expected goals 0.5
0.35 Expected goals per 60 0.88
4.7% Chance per attempt 17.5%
+0.8 Goals above expected +0.5
Rating, in goals
+0.1 Goals above replacement +0.1
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.0
-0.3 Even-strength offence +0.1
+0.1 Even-strength defence -0.1
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.2 Penalties +0.0
Contract
$575K Cap hit $650K
$575K Cap dollars per point $650K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean