Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Eric Tangradi Chad LaRose

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerEric Tangradi: Goals, 0.02 a game, 6th percentileEric Tangradi: Assists, 0.07 a game, 13th percentileEric Tangradi: Points, 0.10 a game, 7th percentileEric Tangradi: Shots, 1.17 a game, 26th percentileEric Tangradi: Hits, 2.12 a game, 85th percentileEric Tangradi: Corsi for %, 50.1%, 54th percentileEric Tangradi: CF% rel, 0.6, 57th percentileEric Tangradi: On-ice xG %, 48.2%, 36th percentileEric Tangradi: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 38th percentileEric Tangradi: Chances created, 0.77 xG per 60, 64th percentileEric Tangradi: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 59th percentileEric Tangradi: Finishing, -4.3 goals above expected, 6th percentileChad LaRose: Goals, 0.06 a game, 13th percentileChad LaRose: Assists, 0.06 a game, 10th percentileChad LaRose: Points, 0.11 a game, 9th percentileChad LaRose: Shots, 1.86 a game, 61st percentileChad LaRose: Hits, 1.69 a game, 71st percentileChad LaRose: Corsi for %, 51.6%, 66th percentileChad LaRose: CF% rel, 0.1, 53rd percentileChad LaRose: On-ice xG %, 47.0%, 30th percentileChad LaRose: Rating, -1.8 goals above replacement, 6th percentileChad LaRose: Chances created, 0.85 xG per 60, 75th percentileChad LaRose: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 22nd percentileChad LaRose: Finishing, -4.4 goals above expected, 5th percentile
012342040Eric Tangradi 4Chad LaRose 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Eric Tangradi
Chad LaRose

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Eric Tangradi L, NJD 2012-13 Chad LaRose R, CAR
41 Games played 35
1 Goals 2
3 Assists 2
4 Points 4
0.10 Points per game 0.11
-2 Plus/minus -8
48 Shots 65
2.1 Shooting % 3.1
87 Hits 59
22 Penalty minutes 29
10:05 Average ice time 12:51
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.1 Corsi for % 51.6
+0.6 CF% relative to team +0.1
49.7 Fenwick for % 52.0
48.2 Expected goals for % 47.0
-1.5 xGF% relative to team -1.3
45.0 Goals for % 31.8
99.3 PDO 94.7
83 Shot attempts taken 103
Expected goals, all situations
5.3 Expected goals 6.4
0.77 Expected goals per 60 0.85
7.7% Chance per attempt 6.6%
-4.3 Goals above expected -4.4
Rating, in goals
+1.0 Goals above replacement -1.8
+0.2 Wins above replacement -0.3
-1.6 Even-strength offence -2.3
+0.8 Even-strength defence -0.2
-0.1 Power play -0.6
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.7 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$726K Cap hit $1.7M
$182K Cap dollars per point $425K
$1.4M Worth at the going rate -$1.1M
+$682K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.8M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean