Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2011-12 season

At a glance

Eric Tangradi Tim Kennedy

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerEric Tangradi: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileEric Tangradi: Assists, 0.08 a game, 15th percentileEric Tangradi: Points, 0.08 a game, 5th percentileEric Tangradi: Shots, 0.83 a game, 12th percentileEric Tangradi: Hits, 1.75 a game, 80th percentileEric Tangradi: Corsi for %, 55.5%, 91st percentileEric Tangradi: CF% rel, -0.8, 42nd percentileEric Tangradi: On-ice xG %, 56.1%, 92nd percentileEric Tangradi: Rating, -0.3 goals above replacement, 20th percentileEric Tangradi: Chances created, 0.64 xG per 60, 36th percentileEric Tangradi: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 46th percentileEric Tangradi: Finishing, -2.3 goals above expected, 30th percentileTim Kennedy: Goals, 0.04 a game, 9th percentileTim Kennedy: Assists, 0.04 a game, 5th percentileTim Kennedy: Points, 0.07 a game, 4th percentileTim Kennedy: Shots, 0.81 a game, 10th percentileTim Kennedy: Hits, 1.78 a game, 81st percentileTim Kennedy: Corsi for %, 46.0%, 15th percentileTim Kennedy: CF% rel, -3.9, 17th percentileTim Kennedy: On-ice xG %, 45.5%, 16th percentileTim Kennedy: Rating, +0.7 goals above replacement, 30th percentileTim Kennedy: Chances created, 0.38 xG per 60, 2nd percentileTim Kennedy: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 54th percentileTim Kennedy: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 44th percentile
00.511.5220Eric Tangradi 2Tim Kennedy 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Eric Tangradi
Tim Kennedy

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Eric Tangradi L, NJD 2011-12 Tim Kennedy L, PHX
24 Games played 27
0 Goals 1
2 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.08 Points per game 0.07
-4 Plus/minus -11
20 Shots 22
0.0 Shooting % 4.5
42 Hits 48
16 Penalty minutes 4
8:56 Average ice time 11:08
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
55.5 Corsi for % 46.0
-0.8 CF% relative to team -3.9
53.8 Fenwick for % 45.9
56.1 Expected goals for % 45.5
-0.2 xGF% relative to team -1.8
37.5 Goals for % 14.3
95.0 PDO 93.0
38 Shot attempts taken 27
Expected goals, all situations
2.3 Expected goals 1.9
0.64 Expected goals per 60 0.38
7.3% Chance per attempt 7.6%
-2.3 Goals above expected -0.9
Rating, in goals
-0.3 Goals above replacement +0.7
0.0 Wins above replacement +0.1
-1.0 Even-strength offence -1.8
+0.7 Even-strength defence +1.0
-0.2 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
-0.3 Penalties +0.9

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean