Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Eric Tangradi Daniel Carr

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerEric Tangradi: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileEric Tangradi: Assists, 0.17 a game, 31st percentileEric Tangradi: Points, 0.17 a game, 7th percentileEric Tangradi: Shots, 1.67 a game, 50th percentileEric Tangradi: Hits, 1.83 a game, 82nd percentileEric Tangradi: Corsi for %, 44.1%, 4th percentileEric Tangradi: CF% rel, 4.0, 89th percentileEric Tangradi: On-ice xG %, 45.2%, 14th percentileEric Tangradi: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 25th percentileEric Tangradi: Chances created, 0.56 xG per 60, 14th percentileEric Tangradi: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 42nd percentileEric Tangradi: Finishing, -0.8 goals above expected, 49th percentileDaniel Carr: Goals, 0.17 a game, 47th percentileDaniel Carr: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileDaniel Carr: Points, 0.17 a game, 7th percentileDaniel Carr: Shots, 1.83 a game, 58th percentileDaniel Carr: Hits, 1.50 a game, 70th percentileDaniel Carr: Corsi for %, 61.6%, 99th percentileDaniel Carr: CF% rel, 10.8, 99th percentileDaniel Carr: On-ice xG %, 55.4%, 87th percentileDaniel Carr: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 30th percentileDaniel Carr: Chances created, 1.07 xG per 60, 90th percentileDaniel Carr: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 36th percentileDaniel Carr: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 54th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Eric Tangradi 1Daniel Carr 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Eric Tangradi
Daniel Carr

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Eric Tangradi L, NJD 2018-19 Daniel Carr L, WSH
6 Games played 6
0 Goals 1
1 Assists 0
1 Points 1
0.17 Points per game 0.17
-3 Plus/minus -1
10 Shots 11
0.0 Shooting % 9.1
11 Hits 9
0 Penalty minutes 0
13:47 Average ice time 9:50
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.1 Corsi for % 61.6
+4.0 CF% relative to team +10.8
43.0 Fenwick for % 58.8
45.2 Expected goals for % 55.4
+6.3 xGF% relative to team +1.4
20.0 Goals for % 40.0
93.2 PDO 91.7
13 Shot attempts taken 18
Expected goals, all situations
0.8 Expected goals 1.0
0.56 Expected goals per 60 1.07
7.7% Chance per attempt 7.5%
-0.8 Goals above expected 0.0
Rating, in goals
+0.3 Goals above replacement +0.8
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.1
+0.1 Even-strength offence -0.3
0.0 Even-strength defence +0.5
-0.1 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.2 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$650K Cap hit $750K
$650K Cap dollars per point $750K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean