Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Keith Aulie Chris Tanev

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKeith Aulie: Goals, 0.04 a game, 46th percentileKeith Aulie: Assists, 0.11 a game, 22nd percentileKeith Aulie: Points, 0.16 a game, 25th percentileKeith Aulie: Shots, 0.82 a game, 24th percentileKeith Aulie: Hits, 2.02 a game, 80th percentileKeith Aulie: Corsi for %, 46.7%, 22nd percentileKeith Aulie: CF% rel, -0.2, 48th percentileKeith Aulie: On-ice xG %, 49.8%, 48th percentileKeith Aulie: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 35th percentileKeith Aulie: Chances created, 0.12 xG per 60, 27th percentileKeith Aulie: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 17th percentileKeith Aulie: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 70th percentileChris Tanev: Goals, 0.05 a game, 49th percentileChris Tanev: Assists, 0.13 a game, 29th percentileChris Tanev: Points, 0.18 a game, 32nd percentileChris Tanev: Shots, 0.53 a game, 6th percentileChris Tanev: Hits, 0.37 a game, 3rd percentileChris Tanev: Corsi for %, 51.7%, 69th percentileChris Tanev: CF% rel, -1.1, 39th percentileChris Tanev: On-ice xG %, 50.6%, 58th percentileChris Tanev: Rating, +3.0 goals above replacement, 76th percentileChris Tanev: Chances created, 0.09 xG per 60, 12th percentileChris Tanev: Shot quality, 3.0% a shot, 41st percentileChris Tanev: Finishing, +1.0 goals above expected, 74th percentile
02462040Keith Aulie 7Chris Tanev 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Keith Aulie
Chris Tanev

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Keith Aulie D, EDM 2012-13 Chris Tanev D, TOR
45 Games played 38
2 Goals 2
5 Assists 5
7 Points 7
0.16 Points per game 0.18
1 Plus/minus 4
37 Shots 20
5.4 Shooting % 10.0
91 Hits 14
60 Penalty minutes 10
12:49 Average ice time 17:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.7 Corsi for % 51.7
-0.2 CF% relative to team -1.1
46.7 Fenwick for % 51.6
49.8 Expected goals for % 50.6
+2.1 xGF% relative to team -1.1
53.5 Goals for % 54.8
101.6 PDO 100.8
76 Shot attempts taken 54
Expected goals, all situations
1.2 Expected goals 1.0
0.12 Expected goals per 60 0.09
2.4% Chance per attempt 3.0%
+0.8 Goals above expected +1.0
Rating, in goals
+0.3 Goals above replacement +3.0
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.5
+0.1 Even-strength offence -2.1
+0.1 Even-strength defence +2.1
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.2 Penalty kill +0.3
-1.6 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$578K Cap hit $900K
$83K Cap dollars per point $129K
$808K Worth at the going rate $3.1M
+$230K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean