Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Logan Couture Rick Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerLogan Couture: Goals, 0.29 a game, 83rd percentileLogan Couture: Assists, 0.40 a game, 85th percentileLogan Couture: Points, 0.69 a game, 84th percentileLogan Couture: Shots, 2.63 a game, 89th percentileLogan Couture: Hits, 0.56 a game, 20th percentileLogan Couture: Corsi for %, 53.1%, 79th percentileLogan Couture: CF% rel, 0.1, 47th percentileLogan Couture: On-ice xG %, 62.2%, 99th percentileLogan Couture: Rating, +8.2 goals above replacement, 84th percentileLogan Couture: Chances created, 1.01 xG per 60, 90th percentileLogan Couture: Shot quality, 8.1% a shot, 67th percentileLogan Couture: Finishing, -1.2 goals above expected, 40th percentileRick Nash: Goals, 0.25 a game, 75th percentileRick Nash: Assists, 0.35 a game, 78th percentileRick Nash: Points, 0.60 a game, 75th percentileRick Nash: Shots, 3.05 a game, 94th percentileRick Nash: Hits, 1.15 a game, 51st percentileRick Nash: Corsi for %, 47.1%, 23rd percentileRick Nash: CF% rel, -0.6, 40th percentileRick Nash: On-ice xG %, 46.5%, 23rd percentileRick Nash: Rating, +5.1 goals above replacement, 69th percentileRick Nash: Chances created, 1.03 xG per 60, 92nd percentileRick Nash: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 31st percentileRick Nash: Finishing, -5.5 goals above expected, 8th percentile
0102030204060Logan Couture 36Rick Nash 36

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Logan Couture
Rick Nash

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Logan Couture C, SJS 2015-16 Rick Nash L, BOS
52 Games played 60
15 Goals 15
21 Assists 21
36 Points 36
0.69 Points per game 0.60
2 Plus/minus 8
137 Shots 183
10.9 Shooting % 8.2
29 Hits 69
20 Penalty minutes 30
17:23 Average ice time 16:56
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.1 Corsi for % 47.1
+0.1 CF% relative to team -0.6
54.2 Fenwick for % 47.6
62.2 Expected goals for % 46.5
+4.7 xGF% relative to team -0.7
57.8 Goals for % 57.4
101.0 PDO 103.5
157 Shot attempts taken 245
Expected goals, all situations
15.2 Expected goals 17.5
1.01 Expected goals per 60 1.03
8.1% Chance per attempt 7.0%
-1.2 Goals above expected -5.5
Rating, in goals
+8.2 Goals above replacement +5.1
+1.4 Wins above replacement +0.8
+0.7 Even-strength offence +2.0
+3.4 Even-strength defence -0.8
+1.1 Power play -0.3
+0.2 Penalty kill +0.3
+0.3 Penalties +1.1
Contract
$6M Cap hit $7.8M
$167K Cap dollars per point $217K
$5.7M Worth at the going rate $3.8M
-$278K Value: worth minus cap hit -$4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean