Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Matt Cullen

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.12 a game, 30th percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.25 a game, 54th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.37 a game, 42nd percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.38 a game, 35th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.29 a game, 53rd percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.9%, 71st percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, 1.1, 58th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 53.2%, 69th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +7.7 goals above replacement, 81st percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.72 xG per 60, 51st percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 10.7% a shot, 99th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -5.3 goals above expected, 6th percentileMatt Cullen: Goals, 0.11 a game, 29th percentileMatt Cullen: Assists, 0.29 a game, 63rd percentileMatt Cullen: Points, 0.40 a game, 48th percentileMatt Cullen: Shots, 1.45 a game, 38th percentileMatt Cullen: Hits, 0.16 a game, 1st percentileMatt Cullen: Corsi for %, 53.5%, 77th percentileMatt Cullen: CF% rel, -0.1, 45th percentileMatt Cullen: On-ice xG %, 56.3%, 89th percentileMatt Cullen: Rating, +3.7 goals above replacement, 56th percentileMatt Cullen: Chances created, 0.67 xG per 60, 43rd percentileMatt Cullen: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 37th percentileMatt Cullen: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 32nd percentile
0510152025204060Riley Nash 25Matt Cullen 25

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Matt Cullen

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2014-15 Matt Cullen C, PIT
68 Games played 62
8 Goals 7
17 Assists 18
25 Points 25
0.37 Points per game 0.40
-10 Plus/minus 8
94 Shots 90
8.5 Shooting % 7.8
88 Hits 10
12 Penalty minutes 16
16:19 Average ice time 13:01
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.9 Corsi for % 53.5
+1.1 CF% relative to team -0.1
52.0 Fenwick for % 54.4
53.2 Expected goals for % 56.3
+2.7 xGF% relative to team +2.0
44.8 Goals for % 58.9
97.7 PDO 101.6
126 Shot attempts taken 143
Expected goals, all situations
13.3 Expected goals 9.1
0.72 Expected goals per 60 0.67
10.7% Chance per attempt 7.0%
-5.3 Goals above expected -2.1
Rating, in goals
+7.7 Goals above replacement +3.7
+1.3 Wins above replacement +0.6
-0.1 Even-strength offence +0.8
+3.6 Even-strength defence +0.7
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.7 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.5 Penalties 0.0
Contract
$575K Cap hit $3.5M
$23K Cap dollars per point $140K
$5.2M Worth at the going rate $2.8M
+$4.6M Value: worth minus cap hit -$712K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean