Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Alexandre Burrows

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.14 a game, 42nd percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.20 a game, 47th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.34 a game, 44th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.19 a game, 26th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 0.91 a game, 39th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.0%, 71st percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -0.4, 42nd percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 52.0%, 65th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +4.2 goals above replacement, 63rd percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.62 xG per 60, 33rd percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 8.9% a shot, 86th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 59th percentileAlexandre Burrows: Goals, 0.11 a game, 33rd percentileAlexandre Burrows: Assists, 0.16 a game, 38th percentileAlexandre Burrows: Points, 0.28 a game, 36th percentileAlexandre Burrows: Shots, 1.71 a game, 55th percentileAlexandre Burrows: Hits, 1.03 a game, 44th percentileAlexandre Burrows: Corsi for %, 48.2%, 32nd percentileAlexandre Burrows: CF% rel, 1.3, 58th percentileAlexandre Burrows: On-ice xG %, 44.2%, 12th percentileAlexandre Burrows: Rating, -0.1 goals above replacement, 22nd percentileAlexandre Burrows: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 45th percentileAlexandre Burrows: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 49th percentileAlexandre Burrows: Finishing, -6.5 goals above expected, 4th percentile
05101520204060Riley Nash 22Alexandre Burrows 22

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Alexandre Burrows

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2015-16 Alexandre Burrows R, OTT
64 Games played 79
9 Goals 9
13 Assists 13
22 Points 22
0.34 Points per game 0.28
-5 Plus/minus -13
76 Shots 135
11.8 Shooting % 6.7
58 Hits 81
18 Penalty minutes 49
12:57 Average ice time 15:10
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.0 Corsi for % 48.2
-0.4 CF% relative to team +1.3
50.6 Fenwick for % 47.9
52.0 Expected goals for % 44.2
+1.2 xGF% relative to team +0.3
46.5 Goals for % 40.4
98.7 PDO 98.4
105 Shot attempts taken 166
Expected goals, all situations
8.6 Expected goals 13.5
0.62 Expected goals per 60 0.68
8.9% Chance per attempt 7.4%
+0.4 Goals above expected -6.5
Rating, in goals
+4.2 Goals above replacement -0.1
+0.7 Wins above replacement 0.0
-0.7 Even-strength offence -2.2
+1.9 Even-strength defence -0.3
+0.3 Power play -0.8
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.2
+0.4 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$1.15M Cap hit $4.5M
$52K Cap dollars per point $205K
$3.2M Worth at the going rate $474K
+$2.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean