Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Kyle Brodziak

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.14 a game, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.19 a game, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.33 a game, 40th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.18 a game, 25th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 1.11 a game, 49th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 50.6%, 49th percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -0.1, 46th percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 52.0%, 64th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +5.5 goals above replacement, 70th percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 41st percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 8.9% a shot, 91st percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 47th percentileKyle Brodziak: Goals, 0.10 a game, 27th percentileKyle Brodziak: Assists, 0.20 a game, 43rd percentileKyle Brodziak: Points, 0.30 a game, 35th percentileKyle Brodziak: Shots, 1.42 a game, 37th percentileKyle Brodziak: Hits, 0.90 a game, 39th percentileKyle Brodziak: Corsi for %, 44.0%, 8th percentileKyle Brodziak: CF% rel, -6.4, 5th percentileKyle Brodziak: On-ice xG %, 44.5%, 13th percentileKyle Brodziak: Rating, -1.3 goals above replacement, 13th percentileKyle Brodziak: Chances created, 0.43 xG per 60, 7th percentileKyle Brodziak: Shot quality, 5.6% a shot, 3rd percentileKyle Brodziak: Finishing, -2.5 goals above expected, 28th percentile
0510152020406080Riley Nash 24Kyle Brodziak 24

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Kyle Brodziak

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2013-14 Kyle Brodziak C, EDM
73 Games played 81
10 Goals 8
14 Assists 16
24 Points 24
0.33 Points per game 0.30
0 Plus/minus 0
86 Shots 115
11.6 Shooting % 7.0
81 Hits 73
29 Penalty minutes 61
12:40 Average ice time 16:13
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.6 Corsi for % 44.0
-0.1 CF% relative to team -6.4
49.7 Fenwick for % 43.3
52.0 Expected goals for % 44.5
+4.3 xGF% relative to team -7.4
51.8 Goals for % 47.4
100.3 PDO 101.2
123 Shot attempts taken 201
Expected goals, all situations
10.5 Expected goals 9.5
0.68 Expected goals per 60 0.43
8.9% Chance per attempt 5.6%
-0.5 Goals above expected -2.5
Rating, in goals
+5.5 Goals above replacement -1.3
+0.9 Wins above replacement -0.2
-0.1 Even-strength offence -4.9
+2.9 Even-strength defence +0.4
-0.1 Power play -0.2
0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.3 Penalties -0.5
Contract
$575K Cap hit $2.833M
$24K Cap dollars per point $118K
$3.7M Worth at the going rate -$232K
+$3.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean