Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Riley Nash Lauri Korpikoski

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerRiley Nash: Goals, 0.14 a game, 42nd percentileRiley Nash: Assists, 0.20 a game, 47th percentileRiley Nash: Points, 0.34 a game, 44th percentileRiley Nash: Shots, 1.19 a game, 26th percentileRiley Nash: Hits, 0.91 a game, 39th percentileRiley Nash: Corsi for %, 52.0%, 71st percentileRiley Nash: CF% rel, -0.4, 42nd percentileRiley Nash: On-ice xG %, 52.0%, 65th percentileRiley Nash: Rating, +4.2 goals above replacement, 63rd percentileRiley Nash: Chances created, 0.62 xG per 60, 33rd percentileRiley Nash: Shot quality, 8.9% a shot, 86th percentileRiley Nash: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 59th percentileLauri Korpikoski: Goals, 0.14 a game, 42nd percentileLauri Korpikoski: Assists, 0.17 a game, 39th percentileLauri Korpikoski: Points, 0.31 a game, 41st percentileLauri Korpikoski: Shots, 1.24 a game, 30th percentileLauri Korpikoski: Hits, 1.41 a game, 64th percentileLauri Korpikoski: Corsi for %, 43.2%, 4th percentileLauri Korpikoski: CF% rel, -7.0, 3rd percentileLauri Korpikoski: On-ice xG %, 39.9%, 1st percentileLauri Korpikoski: Rating, -2.4 goals above replacement, 6th percentileLauri Korpikoski: Chances created, 0.58 xG per 60, 24th percentileLauri Korpikoski: Shot quality, 8.2% a shot, 70th percentileLauri Korpikoski: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 50th percentile
05101520204060Riley Nash 22Lauri Korpikoski 22

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Riley Nash
Lauri Korpikoski

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Riley Nash C, NYR 2015-16 Lauri Korpikoski L, CBJ
64 Games played 71
9 Goals 10
13 Assists 12
22 Points 22
0.34 Points per game 0.31
-5 Plus/minus -17
76 Shots 88
11.8 Shooting % 11.4
58 Hits 100
18 Penalty minutes 10
12:57 Average ice time 13:56
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.0 Corsi for % 43.2
-0.4 CF% relative to team -7.0
50.6 Fenwick for % 42.4
52.0 Expected goals for % 39.9
+1.2 xGF% relative to team -11.2
46.5 Goals for % 33.3
98.7 PDO 97.3
105 Shot attempts taken 123
Expected goals, all situations
8.6 Expected goals 9.5
0.62 Expected goals per 60 0.58
8.9% Chance per attempt 8.2%
+0.4 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
+4.2 Goals above replacement -2.4
+0.7 Wins above replacement -0.4
-0.7 Even-strength offence -3.8
+1.9 Even-strength defence -1.0
+0.3 Power play +0.4
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.8
+0.4 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$1.15M Cap hit $2.5M
$52K Cap dollars per point $114K
$3.2M Worth at the going rate -$944K
+$2.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean